CVE-2024-28180VulnerabilityPublished 26 Feb 2026Updated 12 Oct 2026

SUSE · Security update for containerized-data-importer

Affects SUSESource GCVE Database

Mentioned vulnerabilities

Not known to be exploited : upgrade to 4.17.2 soon.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

Severity

High

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS: 1.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 80% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 4.17.2

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade SUSE to 4.17.2.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SUSE Product Security Team SUSE	Affected >=4.17.0 <4.17.2 Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17 ppc64le openshift4/ose-cluster-autoscaler-rhel9@sha256:972676e357006455133c46f54ca1762ece1a6f37a533c91397b24f11bfccc58a_ppc64le SUSE x86_64 containerized-data-importer-api-1.64.0-160000.1.1.x86_64 containerized-data-importer-cloner-1.64.0-160000.1.1.x86_64 containerized-data-importer-controller-1.64.0-160000.1.1.x86_64 containerized-data-importer-manifests-0:1.64.0-160000.1.1.x86_64 SUSE Linux Enterprise SUSE Linux Micro 6.2	Fixed in 4.17.2

AI-suggested

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform users running versions >=4.17.0 and <4.17.2 should upgrade to version 4.17.2, which contains fixes for these vulnerabilities. The vendor manages remediation through updated packages and images available via the appropriate release channels. Users should follow the official upgrade instructions provided by Red Hat at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.17/updating/updating_a_cluster/updating-cluster-cli.html. No additional mitigations are indicated beyond applying the update.

Description

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is Red Hat's cloud computing Kubernetes application platform solution designed for on-premise or private cloud deployments. Security Fix(es): * encoding/gob: golang: Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion (CVE-2024-34156) * jose-go: improper handling of highly compressed data (CVE-2024-28180) * go/parser: golang: Calling any of the Parse functions containing deeply nested literals can cause a panic/stack exhaustion (CVE-2024-34155) * go/build/constraint: golang: Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion (CVE-2024-34158) * openstack-ironic: Lack of checksum validation on images (CVE-2024-47211) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

Impact

The vulnerabilities fixed in this update primarily involve denial of service conditions caused by stack exhaustion panics when processing deeply nested or highly compressed data structures. The lack of checksum validation on OpenStack Ironic images could allow corrupted or tampered images to be accepted, potentially impacting system integrity. No known exploits in the wild have been reported at this time. The overall security impact is rated as important by Red Hat Product Security.

Summary

This advisory covers multiple security issues fixed in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17.2. Notably, CVE-2024-28180 involves improper handling of highly compressed data in the jose-go library, which could lead to security issues. Other vulnerabilities include stack exhaustion panics in Go language components: encoding/gob Decoder.Decode on deeply nested messages (CVE-2024-34156), go/parser Parse functions with deeply nested literals (CVE-2024-34155), and go/build/constraint Parse on deeply nested build tag expressions (CVE-2024-34158). Additionally, CVE-2024-47211 addresses a lack of checksum validation on OpenStack Ironic images. These issues could cause denial of service or other impacts related to processing malformed inputs. The advisory does not provide CVSS scores but rates the update as important.

CWE-409Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product does not handle or incorrectly handles a compressed input with a very high compression ratio that produces a large output.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
File Upload (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
V12.1.1 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-674Uncontrolled Recursion (opens in a new tab)
Class weakness
The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.
Implementation
Ensure that an end condition will be reached under all logic conditions. The end condition may include checking against the depth of recursion and exiting with an error if the recursion goes too deep. The complexity of the end condition contributes to the effectiveness of this action.
Implementation
Increase the stack size.
Attack patterns
Serialized Data with Nested Payloads (opens in a new tab)
Oversized Serialized Data Payloads (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-1325Improperly Controlled Sequential Memory Allocation (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product manages a group of objects or resources and performs a separate memory allocation for each object, but it does not properly limit the total amount of memory that is consumed by all of the combined objects.
Implementation
Ensure multiple allocations of the same kind of object are properly tracked - possibly across multiple sessions, requests, or messages. Define an appropriate strategy for handling requests that exceed the limit, and consider supporting a configuration option so that the administrator can extend the amount of memory to…
Operation
Run the program using system-provided resource limits for memory. This might still cause the program to crash or exit, but the impact to the rest of the system will be minimized.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.1 (opens in a new tab)
V11.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Excessive Allocation (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-354Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: Medium
The product does not validate or incorrectly validates the integrity check values or "checksums" of a message. This may prevent it from detecting if the data has been modified or corrupted in transmission.
Implementation
Ensure that the checksums present in messages are properly checked in accordance with the protocol specification before they are parsed and used.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
REST Security (opens in a new tab)
JSON Web Token for Java (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V11.1.7 (opens in a new tab)
V13.3.2 (opens in a new tab)
V3.5.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Checksum Spoofing (opens in a new tab)
Padding Oracle Crypto Attack (opens in a new tab)
Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 15 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-409, CWE-674, CWE-1325 +1

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats