CVE-2025-1220VulnerabilityPublished 27 Jan 2026Updated 8 Jul 2026

Red Hat Security Advisory: php:8.2 security update

Affects Red HatSource GCVE Database

Mentioned vulnerabilities

Authoritative record:CVE-2025-1220· Low 3.7

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.7 Low · fixed in Red Hat package updates : update the Debian debian/php package when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS base score

3.7Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 54% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 8.4.10, 8.3.23, 8.2.29 +1

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 13 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade the Debian debian/php package to 8.4.10, 8.3.23, 8.2.29 or 8.1.33.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Debiandebian/php`pkg:deb/debian/php`Other threats	Affected =8.1.0 <8.1.33 =8.2.0 <8.2.29 =8.3.0 <8.3.23 =8.4.0 <8.4.10	Fixed in 8.1.33 8.2.29 8.3.23 8.4.10

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Red Hat has released updated PHP 8.2 packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 that address these vulnerabilities. Users should apply the security update as detailed in the Red Hat advisory RHSA-2026:1409 and the referenced article https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258. Applying the official update is the recommended and effective mitigation. No additional vendor advisories indicate that no action is required or that these issues are already mitigated without patching.

Description

PHP is an HTML-embedded scripting language commonly used with the Apache HTTP Server. Security Fix(es): * php: pgsql extension does not check for errors during escaping (CVE-2025-1735) * php: NULL Pointer Dereference in PHP SOAP Extension via Large XML Namespace Prefix (CVE-2025-6491) * php: PHP Hostname Null Character Vulnerability (CVE-2025-1220) * php: heap-based buffer overflow in array_merge() (CVE-2025-14178) * php: PHP: Information disclosure via getimagesize() function when reading multi-chunk images (CVE-2025-14177) * php: PHP: Denial of Service via invalid character sequence in PDO PostgreSQL prepared statement (CVE-2025-14180) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

Impact

The vulnerabilities collectively could lead to various impacts including potential denial of service, information disclosure, memory corruption, and error handling failures in PHP applications running on affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 systems. The issues affect core PHP extensions such as pgsql, SOAP, and PDO PostgreSQL, which are commonly used in web applications. The severity is rated high by Red Hat Product Security, indicating significant risk if unpatched.

Summary

This Red Hat Security Advisory (RHSA-2026:1409) addresses multiple vulnerabilities in the PHP 8.2 module used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. The fixed issues include: CVE-2025-1735 (pgsql extension error handling), CVE-2025-6491 (NULL pointer dereference in SOAP extension), CVE-2025-1220 (hostname null character vulnerability), CVE-2025-14178 (heap-based buffer overflow in array_merge()), CVE-2025-14177 (information disclosure via getimagesize()), and CVE-2025-14180 (denial of service via invalid character sequence in PDO PostgreSQL prepared statements). Red Hat has released updated packages to remediate these vulnerabilities. The advisory rates the update as Important with a high severity level, but no CVSS scores are provided in the advisory itself. The update applies to multiple architectures and variants of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.

CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #22OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.2.6 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Server Side Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-476NULL Pointer Dereference (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: MediumCWE Top 25 (2025): #13OWASP Top 10 A10:2025: Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions (opens in a new tab)
The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.
Implementation
For any pointers that could have been modified or provided from a function that can return NULL, check the pointer for NULL before use. When working with a multithreaded or otherwise asynchronous environment, ensure that proper locking APIs are used to lock before the check, and unlock when it has finished.
Requirements
Select a programming language that is not susceptible to these issues.
Implementation
Check the results of all functions that return a value and verify that the value is non-null before acting upon it.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Logging (opens in a new tab)
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V11.1.7 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-125Out-of-bounds Read (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #8
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design · Language Selection
Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Overread Buffers (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-787Out-of-bounds Write (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #5
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Requirements · Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 28 Jun 2026, 00:44 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-918, CWE-476, CWE-125 +1

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats