Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 release and security update

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V14.5.2 (opens in a new tab)
• V14.5.3 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) (opens in a new tab)
• Cache Poisoning (opens in a new tab)
• DNS Cache Poisoning (opens in a new tab)
• Exploit Script-Based APIs (opens in a new tab)
• Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
• V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V9.2.3 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Reflection Attack in Authentication Protocol (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Requirements

   Specify which data in the software should be regarded as sensitive. Consider which types of users should have access to which types of data.

2. Implementation

   Ensure that any possibly sensitive data specified in the requirements is verified with designers to ensure that it is either a calculated risk or mitigated elsewhere.

3. System Configuration

   Setup default error messages so that unexpected errors do not disclose sensitive information.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
• Logging (opens in a new tab)
• Authorization (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
• V7.3.3 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Choosing Message Identifier (opens in a new tab)
• Exploiting Incorrectly Configured SSL/TLS (opens in a new tab)
• WiFi MAC Address Tracking (opens in a new tab)
• WiFi SSID Tracking (opens in a new tab)
• Cellular Broadcast Message Request (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation

   Avoid using CRLF as a special sequence.

2. Implementation

   Appropriately filter or quote CRLF sequences in user-controlled input.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
• Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
• Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• SQL Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Injection Prevention in Java (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Command Delimiters (opens in a new tab)
• Web Server Logs Tampering (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Requirements

   Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.

2. Architecture and Design

   Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.

3. Architecture and Design

   Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V8.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V13.4.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V11.1.4 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• XML Ping of the Death (opens in a new tab)
• Exponential Data Expansion (opens in a new tab)
• Serialized Data Parameter Blowup (opens in a new tab)
• Serialized Data with Nested Payloads (opens in a new tab)
• Oversized Serialized Data Payloads (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design

   Use regular expressions that do not support backtracking, e.g. by removing nested quantifiers.

2. System Configuration

   Set backtracking limits in the configuration of the regular expression implementation, such as PHP's pcre.backtrack_limit. Also consider limits on execution time for the process.

3. Implementation

   Do not use regular expressions with untrusted input. If regular expressions must be used, avoid using backtracking in the expression.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• File Upload (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V12.1.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Regular Expression Exponential Blowup (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design

   URL Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated and processed for authorization. Make sure that your application does not decode the same input twice.

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
• V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
• V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Developers should anticipate that inconsistent special elements will be injected/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.

2. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
• Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
• Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
• Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.2.7 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

2. Implementation · Input Validation

   Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
• Deserialization (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Passing Local Filenames to Functions That Expect a URL (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation

   If available, use features of the language or framework that allow specification of allowlists of attributes or fields that are allowed to be modified. If possible, prefer allowlists over denylists.

2. Architecture and Design · Implementation

   If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   For any externally-influenced input, check the input against an allowlist of internal object attributes or fields that are allowed to be modified.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
• Software Supply Chain Security (opens in a new tab)
• Infrastructure as Code (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V5.1.2 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks

   Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

2. Implementation · Architecture and Design

   Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.

3. Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction

   Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
• Deserialization (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
• DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
• Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
• Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
• Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation

   Use a web server that employs a strict HTTP parsing procedure, such as Apache.

2. Implementation

   Use only SSL communication.

3. Implementation

   Terminate the client session after each request.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• REST Assessment (opens in a new tab)
• REST Security (opens in a new tab)
• Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.2.5 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• HTTP Response Smuggling (opens in a new tab)
• HTTP Request Smuggling (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design · Refactoring

   Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.

2. Architecture and Design

   Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
• Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V5.2.8 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.2.5 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files (opens in a new tab)
• Manipulating User-Controlled Variables (opens in a new tab)
• Code Injection (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design · Input Validation

   Avoid making decisions based on names of resources (e.g. files) if those resources can have alternate names.

2. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
• V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V9.2.3 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation

   Do not use user-controlled data for loop conditions.

2. Implementation

   Perform input validation.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• File Upload (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V12.1.1 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design

   Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.

2. Architecture and Design

   For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…

3. Architecture and Design

   Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V1.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.2.4 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Choosing Message Identifier (opens in a new tab)
• Force the System to Reset Values (opens in a new tab)
• Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality (opens in a new tab)
• Cross Site Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
• Communication Channel Manipulation (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Enforcement by Conversion

   If the number to be used is always expected to be positive, change the variable type from signed to unsigned or size_t.

2. Implementation · Input Validation

   If the number to be used could have a negative value based on the specification (thus requiring a signed value), but the number should only be positive to preserve code correctness, then include a check to ensure that the value is positive.

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).