CVE-2025-58056VulnerabilityPublished 2 Oct 2025Updated 7 Sep 2026

Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.15.7 release and security update

Affects Red HatSource GCVE Database

Mentioned vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-58057

Not known to be exploited.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

Severity

Medium

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS: 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 53% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 2 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Red Hat Product Security Red Hat	Affected Red Hat Red Hat build of Quarkus Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.15.7	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Red Hat has released an updated version of the Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.15.7 that addresses these vulnerabilities. Users should apply this update to remediate the issues. Before applying the update, ensure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Detailed instructions for applying the update are available at https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258. No additional mitigations are specified by the vendor advisory.

Description

This release of Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.15.7 includes the following CVE fixes: * netty-codec-http: Netty is vulnerable to request smuggling due to incorrect parsing of chunk extensions [quarkus-3.15] (CVE-2025-58056) * netty-codec: Netty's BrotliDecoder is vulnerable to DoS via zip bomb style attack [quarkus-3.15] (CVE-2025-58057) For more information, see the release notes page listed in the References section.

Impact

Successful exploitation of CVE-2025-58056 could allow an attacker to perform HTTP request smuggling attacks, potentially bypassing security controls or interfering with request handling. CVE-2025-58057 could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service by triggering resource exhaustion in the BrotliDecoder via a specially crafted compressed payload. Both vulnerabilities affect the Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.15.7 and related Netty components. No known exploits in the wild have been reported at this time.

CWE-444Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.
Implementation
Use a web server that employs a strict HTTP parsing procedure, such as Apache.
Implementation
Use only SSL communication.
Implementation
Terminate the client session after each request.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
REST Assessment (opens in a new tab)
REST Security (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.2.5 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
HTTP Response Smuggling (opens in a new tab)
HTTP Request Smuggling (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-409Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product does not handle or incorrectly handles a compressed input with a very high compression ratio that produces a large output.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
File Upload (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
V12.1.1 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Jul 2026, 01:08 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-444, CWE-409

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats