Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update

1. Implementation

   If the assertion statement is required (e.g., for security or reliability), change the invoking code to avoid the conditions that trigger the assertion.

2. Implementation

   Consider changing the assertion to some other less "fatal" error. This might not be easy to implement, since other code may be needed to handle the error.

3. Implementation

   Make sensitive open/close operations non-reachable from directly user-controlled data (e.g. open/close resources)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Developers should anticipate that null characters or null bytes will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.

2. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
• Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
• Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
• Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.2.2 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Embedding NULL Bytes (opens in a new tab)
• Postfix, Null Terminate, and Backslash (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design

   In order to ensure data integrity, the certificate must be valid, and it must pertain to the site that is being accessed.Fully check the hostname of the certificate and provide the user with adequate information about the nature of the problem and how to proceed.

2. Implementation

   If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.

3. Implementation

   Be careful of other weaknesses in the code that checks the hostname, since it is still possible to incorrectly check the hostname. For example, attackers could create a certificate with a name that begins with a trusted name followed by a NUL byte, which could cause some string-based comparisons to only examine the…

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V1.14.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
• V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design · Implementation

   Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.

2. Implementation

   If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Transport Layer Protection (opens in a new tab)
• TLS Cipher String (opens in a new tab)
• OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V9.2.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.9.2 (opens in a new tab)
• V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate (opens in a new tab)
• Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Requirements

   The choice between a language which has named or unnamed exceptions needs to be done. While unnamed exceptions exacerbate the chance of not properly dealing with an exception, named exceptions suffer from the up call version of the weak base class problem.

2. Requirements

   A language can be used which requires, at compile time, to catch all serious exceptions. However, one must make sure to use the most current version of the API as new exceptions could be added.

3. Implementation

   Catch all relevant exceptions. This is the recommended solution. Ensure that all exceptions are handled in such a way that you can be sure of the state of your system at any given moment.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Logging (opens in a new tab)
• Error Handling (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Requirements

   Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.

2. Architecture and Design

   Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.

3. Architecture and Design

   Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V8.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V13.4.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V11.1.4 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• XML Ping of the Death (opens in a new tab)
• Exponential Data Expansion (opens in a new tab)
• Serialized Data Parameter Blowup (opens in a new tab)
• Serialized Data with Nested Payloads (opens in a new tab)
• Oversized Serialized Data Payloads (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).