CVE-2025-24970VulnerabilityPublished 2 Jun 2025Updated 18 Aug 2026

Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Integration Camel K 1.10.10 release and security update

Affects Red HatSource GCVE Database

Not known to be exploited : upgrade to 3.20.1 soon.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

Severity

High

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS: 2.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 82% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 3.20.1

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 2 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Red Hat to 3.20.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Red Hat Product Security Red Hat	Affected <3.20.1 Red Hat Red Hat Integration RHINT Camel-K 1.10.10	Fixed in 3.20.1

AI-suggested

Red Hat has released an official fix in Red Hat build of Quarkus version 3.20.1. Users should update to this version or later to remediate the vulnerability. Before applying the update, ensure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Follow Red Hat's official guidance on applying updates as detailed in their knowledge base article https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258. No additional mitigation steps are indicated by the vendor.

Description

Camel K 1.10.10 is now available. The purpose of this text-only errata is to inform you about the security issues fixed. Security Fix(es): * io.netty/netty-handler: SslHandler doesn't correctly validate packets which can lead to native crash when using native SSLEngine (CVE-2025-24970) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE important page(s) listed in the References section.

Impact

The vulnerability can cause a native crash in applications using the affected versions of Red Hat build of Quarkus when the native SSLEngine is employed. This may lead to denial of service conditions. No known exploits in the wild have been reported. The impact is rated as important by Red Hat, indicating a high severity but not critical.

Summary

CVE-2025-24970 is a vulnerability in the io.netty/netty-handler component used by Red Hat build of Quarkus. The SslHandler does not correctly validate packets, which can cause a native crash when the native SSLEngine is used. Red Hat has fixed this issue in the Quarkus 3.20.1 release. The advisory references Red Hat Integration Camel K 1.10.10 as also affected and updated. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation). No CVSS score is provided, but Red Hat rates the security impact as Important. The vendor advisory confirms the availability of an official fix in version 3.20.1.

CWE-20Improper Input Validation (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #18OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Attack Surface Reduction
Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of…
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention in Java (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables (opens in a new tab)
Server Side Include (SSI) Injection (opens in a new tab)
Cross Zone Scripting (opens in a new tab)
Command Line Execution through SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
Object Relational Mapping Injection (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-20

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats