Red Hat Security Advisory: RHTAS 1.4.4 - Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer Release

1. Architecture and Design · Refactoring

   Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.

2. Architecture and Design

   Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
• Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V5.2.8 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.2.5 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files (opens in a new tab)
• Manipulating User-Controlled Variables (opens in a new tab)
• Code Injection (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Requirements

   Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.

2. Architecture and Design

   Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.

3. Architecture and Design

   Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V8.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V13.4.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V11.1.4 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• XML Ping of the Death (opens in a new tab)
• Exponential Data Expansion (opens in a new tab)
• Serialized Data Parameter Blowup (opens in a new tab)
• Serialized Data with Nested Payloads (opens in a new tab)
• Oversized Serialized Data Payloads (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

2. Architecture and Design

   For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Authorization (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V12.3.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Path Traversal (opens in a new tab)
• Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic (opens in a new tab)
• Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls (opens in a new tab)
• Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding (opens in a new tab)
• Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V14.5.2 (opens in a new tab)
• V14.5.3 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) (opens in a new tab)
• Cache Poisoning (opens in a new tab)
• DNS Cache Poisoning (opens in a new tab)
• Exploit Script-Based APIs (opens in a new tab)
• Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation

   Do not use user-controlled data for loop conditions.

2. Implementation

   Perform input validation.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Enforcement by Conversion

   If the number to be used is always expected to be positive, change the variable type from signed to unsigned or size_t.

2. Implementation · Input Validation

   If the number to be used could have a negative value based on the specification (thus requiring a signed value), but the number should only be positive to preserve code correctness, then include a check to ensure that the value is positive.

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design

   It is highly recommended to use a true random number generator (TRNG) to ensure the security of encryption schemes. Hardware-based TRNGs generate unpredictable, unbiased, and independent random numbers because they employ physical phenomena, e.g., electrical noise, as sources to generate random numbers.

2. Implementation

   It is highly recommended to use a true random number generator (TRNG) to ensure the security of encryption schemes. Hardware-based TRNGs generate unpredictable, unbiased, and independent random numbers because they employ physical phenomena, e.g., electrical noise, as sources to generate random numbers.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Forgot Password (opens in a new tab)
• Transport Layer Protection (opens in a new tab)
• User Privacy Protection (opens in a new tab)
• Password Storage (opens in a new tab)
• Cryptographic Storage (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V2.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V2.6.2 (opens in a new tab)
• V2.7.6 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Cryptanalysis (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation

   If available, use features of the language or framework that allow specification of allowlists of attributes or fields that are allowed to be modified. If possible, prefer allowlists over denylists.

2. Architecture and Design · Implementation

   If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   For any externally-influenced input, check the input against an allowlist of internal object attributes or fields that are allowed to be modified.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
• Software Supply Chain Security (opens in a new tab)
• Infrastructure as Code (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V5.1.2 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design

   Use regular expressions that do not support backtracking, e.g. by removing nested quantifiers.

2. System Configuration

   Set backtracking limits in the configuration of the regular expression implementation, such as PHP's pcre.backtrack_limit. Also consider limits on execution time for the process.

3. Implementation

   Do not use regular expressions with untrusted input. If regular expressions must be used, avoid using backtracking in the expression.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• File Upload (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V12.1.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Regular Expression Exponential Blowup (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

2. Architecture and Design · Language Selection

   Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Overread Buffers (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).