VulnerabilityPublished 29 May 2026Updated 10 Nov 2026

CVE-2026-46702: russh · Post-decompression SSH packet size was not bounded, allowing remote oversized compressed packets

Affects russhSource GCVE Database

Compare

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-46702· High 7.5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High : upgrade to 0.61.1 soon.

Data as of 10 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Patch: Available – fixed in 0.61.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Jun 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 10 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade russh to 0.61.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
crates.iorussh	Affected >=0.34.0 <0.61.1	Fixed in 0.61.1

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary When SSH compression is enabled, `russh` accepted compressed packets whose on-wire size passed the normal transport packet-length checks but whose decompressed size was much larger. This allowed a remote peer to send oversized post-decompression packets that should have been rejected. In current releases, this is a remote denial-of-service / resource-exhaustion issue in the post-decompression receive path. In older releases before `0.58.0`, the same remote decompression path used `CryptoVec`, which appears to make the historical impact worse. ### Details The normal SSH transport read path enforces a packet-length limit before the packet body is read: - `russh/src/cipher/mod.rs` However, RFC 4253 compression is applied to the SSH `payload` field only. The `packet_length` field and MAC are computed over the compressed payload, so a packet that is reasonably sized on the wire can still expand to a much larger message body after decompression. In `russh`, compressed packet bodies are later decompressed in: - `russh/src/compression.rs` - `russh/src/client/mod.rs` - `russh/src/server/session.rs` Before the fix, `Decompress::decompress()` grew its output buffer by repeated doubling and did not enforce a separate post-decompression ceiling. That meant a peer could send a small compressed packet that passed the normal on-wire transport length checks and then inflate it into a much larger packet after decompression. It was verified that an attacker-crafted compressed payload can stay below the normal `256 KiB` implementation transport packet cap while still inflating above the intended post-decompression bound. In other words, this is not only a "large on-wire packet" issue. Version detail: - The underlying post-decompression bounds bug appears to affect `russh` as far back as `0.34.0`. - In historical releases `>= 0.34.0, < 0.58.0`, the remote decompression path still used `CryptoVec`. Remote compressed SSH traffic could drive that path, and under constrained memory that historical code path could abort the process. - In current-style releases `>= 0.58.0`, non-secret packet/decompression buffers were moved off `CryptoVec` and onto `Vec<u8>`, but the post-decompression size still remained unbounded. So the bug class remained reachable remotely, but the maintained-line impact is a current remote DoS / oversized-packet-acceptance issue rather than the older `CryptoVec`-based abort story. - The maintained-line fix was verified against `0.60.2`. Compression is not selected in a default-vs-default `russh` session because the default preference order puts `none` first. However, the default server configuration still advertises `zlib` and `zlib@openssh.com`, and server-side negotiation follows the client's preference order for common algorithms. A client that prefers compression can therefore negotiate it with a default `russh` server. OpenSSH portable was checked at `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable` commit `45b30e0a5`. OpenSSH enforces a `256 KiB` transport packet cap before decompression, but it does not reuse that cap after decompression. Instead, decompression writes to an `sshbuf`, which is indirectly bounded by OpenSSH's `SSHBUF_SIZE_MAX` hard maximum of `0x8000000` bytes (`128 MiB`). The patch direction should follow that model: add an explicit post-decompression ceiling of `128 MiB`, rather than assuming the compressed transport packet cap also bounds decompressed payload size. Relevant OpenSSH reference points: - `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/packet.c`: `PACKET_MAX_SIZE (256 * 1024)` - `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/packet.c`: `uncompress_buffer()` inflates into `compression_buffer` - `/home/mjc/projects/openssh-portable/sshbuf.h`: `SSHBUF_SIZE_MAX 0x8000000` ### RFC / OpenSSH Comparison RFC 4253 section 6 defines the binary packet format: - `packet_length` - `padding_length` - `payload` - random padding - MAC RFC 4253 section 6.2 says that, when compression is negotiated, the `payload` field is compressed, and that `packet_length` and MAC are computed from the compressed payload. The RFC also says implementations should check that packet length is reasonable to avoid denial-of-service and buffer-overflow attacks. That means the pre-decompression transport packet length check is necessary but not sufficient. A correct implementation still needs a reasonable bound on the decompressed payload that becomes parser input. OpenSSH provides such a bound indirectly through `sshbuf`'s hard maximum. The `russh` fix should make the corresponding post-decompression bound explicit. ### PoC There were two kinds of proof: - a wire-cap sanity test showing an attacker-crafted best-compressed `DEBUG` payload can stay below the normal SSH transport packet cap while still inflating beyond the intended post-decompression bound - direct client and server receive-path tests that exercise the oversized post-decompression behavior itself The current in-tree regression tests are: - `

CWE-770Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #25
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
Requirements
Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
Architecture and Design
Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
Architecture and Design
Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.1 (opens in a new tab)
V11.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XML Ping of the Death (opens in a new tab)
Exponential Data Expansion (opens in a new tab)
Serialized Data Parameter Blowup (opens in a new tab)
Serialized Data with Nested Payloads (opens in a new tab)
Oversized Serialized Data Payloads (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

WeaknessesCWE-770

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats