VulnerabilityPublished 27 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-82122: HiRDB · Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Source GCVE Database

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-82122· Critical 9.4

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.4 Critical : upgrade to 10-12-01 as a priority.

Data as of 27 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.4Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Patch: Available – fixed in 10-12-01

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

ghsa-gqg7-qhr5-2xm4

What to do

Upgrade HiRDB Server Version 10 to 10-12-01.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
HitachiHiRDB Server Version 10	Affected >=10-00 <10-12-01	Fixed in 10-12-01
HitachiHiRDB Server Version 9	Affected >=09-00 <=09-66-22	Fixed in–
HitachiHiRDB Server with Additional Function Version 9	Affected =09-00	Fixed in–
HitachiHiRDB Server Version 9(32)	Affected >=09-02 <=09-66-22	Fixed in–
HitachiHiRDB Server with Additional Function Version 9(32)	Affected =09-00	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, consider limiting network exposure of affected HiRDB Server versions and applying standard security controls to reduce attack surface.

Description

A critical stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in HiRDB Server versions 9 and 10 within specified version ranges. The flaw allows for remote exploitation without privileges or user interaction, potentially leading to high confidentiality and integrity impact, and low availability impact.

Impact

Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service due to a stack-based buffer overflow. The impact includes high confidentiality and integrity loss, and low availability impact as per the CVSS vector. No evidence of active exploitation is currently known.

Summary

CVE-2026-82122 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability affecting HiRDB Server versions 10 from 10-00 before 10-12-01; version 9 from 09-00 through 09-66-22; HiRDB Server with Additional Function version 9 from 09-00 through 09-66/V; HiRDB Server version 9(32) from 09-02 through 09-66-22; and HiRDB Server with Additional Function version 9(32) from 09-00 through 09-66-/V. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.4, indicating critical severity, with attack vector network, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploits or known exploitation in the wild are reported.

CWE-121Stack-based Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #14
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
Architecture and Design
Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Implementation
Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-121

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats