VulnerabilityPublished 1 Oct 2026Updated 29 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-103263: Tornado · StaticFileHandler follows symlinks outside static root (path traversal)

Affects sickchillSource GCVE Database

Compare

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-103263· High 8.2

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.2 High : upgrade to 2024.3.1_9 soon.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 07:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.2High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Patch: Available – fixed in 2024.3.1_9

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: Present
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: Present: The successful attack depends on the presence of specific deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These include: a race condition must be won to successfully exploit the vulnerability (the successfulness of the attack is conditioned on execution conditions that are not under full control of the attacker, or the attack may need to be launched multiple times against a single target before being successful); the attacker must inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim (e.g. vulnerabilities requiring an on-path attacker).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 1 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade sickchill to 2024.3.1_9.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewsickchill`pkg:brew/sickchill`Other threats	Affected >=2023.5.30 <2024.3.1_9	Fixed in 2024.3.1_9

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary StaticFileHandler allows an unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files from the server's filesystem by requesting a path that resolves to a symbolic link placed inside the static root directory. Any application that serves user-uploadable content, or whose static directory is populated by a build/deploy pipeline that creates symlinks (e.g. npm link, webpack, Docker volume mounts, CDN sync tools), is affected. An attacker who can trigger the creation of a symlink pointing outside the static root—or exploit one that already exists—can retrieve sensitive files such as /etc/passwd, private keys, configuration files, or application secrets. ### Details The vulnerability is in tornado.web.StaticFileHandler, specifically in the interaction between two methods in [tornado/web.py](vscode-webview://1grdaaa6v64itrol06qu70pq3d1b9h9im5c3npvvc9snaprc1q9f/tornado/web.py): - [get_absolute_path](https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/blob/0ca3c5f8279d402b245718d16522bc18a8f5d958/tornado/web.py#L2932) uses `os.path.abspath()` to resolve the requested path: - [validate_absolute_path](https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/blob/0ca3c5f8279d402b245718d16522bc18a8f5d958/tornado/web.py#L2935) uses the same `os.path.abspath()` on the root, then performs a string prefix check: `os.path.abspath()` normalises . and .. segments but does not resolve symbolic links. As a result, a path like `/var/www/static/link` passes the `startswith("/var/www/static/")` check regardless of where `link` actually points. Immediately after, `os.path.exists()` and `os.path.isfile()` **do follow symlinks**, so the file they ultimately open is the symlink's target. The fix would be to replace os.path.abspath() with os.path.realpath() in both methods, so the resolved real path of the symlink target is validated against the root, not just its string representation inside the static directory. ### PoC _Complete instructions, including specific configuration details, to reproduce the vulnerability._ Prerequisites: Python 3.x, Tornado installed. 1. Create the environment ``` mkdir -p /tmp/static echo "DB_PASSWORD=s3cr3t" > /tmp/secret.conf ln -s /tmp/secret.conf /tmp/static/config.conf ``` 2. Minimal vulnerable server (server.py): ``` import tornado.web, tornado.ioloop app = tornado.web.Application([ (r"/static/(.*)", tornado.web.StaticFileHandler, {"path": "/tmp/static"}), ]) app.listen(8888) tornado.ioloop.IOLoop.current().start() ``` 3. Exploit: `curl http://localhost:8888/static/config.conf` ### Impact Any application using StaticFileHandler is potentially affected if: - the static directory contains symlinks pointing outside it (common with build tooling), or - the application allows file uploads into the static directory without stripping symlinks. An unauthenticated remote attacker can read any file readable by the process user: application secrets, private TLS keys, database credentials, /etc/shadow, SSH keys, or source code (depending on the process's filesystem permissions).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…