CVE-2026-115586VulnerabilityPublished 27 Oct 2026

hatch · virtualenv: Bash activator leaves the --prompt value unescaped in PS1 when promptvars is off, so prompt expansion

Affects hatchSource GCVE Database

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-115586· High 7.1

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.1 High : upgrade to 1.18.1_3 soon.

Data as of 27 Oct 2026, 23:13 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

7.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Patch: Available – fixed in 1.18.1_3

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: High
Attack Requirements: Present
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Active
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: High
Vulnerable system availability: High
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable system is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or through terminal emulation (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., using social engineering techniques to trick a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: High: The successful attack depends on the evasion or circumvention of security-enhancing techniques in place that would otherwise hinder the attack. These include: Evasion of exploit mitigation techniques, for example, circumvention of address space randomization (ASLR) or data execution prevention (DEP) must be performed for the attack to be successful; Obtaining target-specific secrets. The attacker must gather some target-specific secret before the attack can be successful. A secret is any piece of information that cannot be obtained through any amount of reconnaissance. To obtain the secret the attacker must perform additional attacks or break otherwise secure measures (e.g. knowledge of a secret key may be needed to break a crypto channel). This operation must be performed for each attacked target.
Attack Requirements: Present: The successful attack depends on the presence of specific deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These include: a race condition must be won to successfully exploit the vulnerability (the successfulness of the attack is conditioned on execution conditions that are not under full control of the attacker, or the attack may need to be launched multiple times against a single target before being successful); the attacker must inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim (e.g. vulnerabilities requiring an on-path attacker).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Active: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a targeted user to perform specific, conscious interactions with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload, or the user’s interactions would actively subvert protection mechanisms which would lead to exploitation of the vulnerability.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the vulnerable system. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system availability: High: There is a total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the Vulnerable System; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade hatch to 1.18.1_3.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewhatch`pkg:brew/hatch`Other threats	Affected >=1.18.1_2 <1.18.1_3	Fixed in 1.18.1_3

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

## Summary The bash activator puts the caller-supplied prompt value into `PS1` unescaped whenever `promptvars` is off at activation time, and assumes prompt expansion can never run afterwards. `promptvars` and posix mode are runtime shell state, not a property of the activation moment: re-enabling prompt expansion in the same shell (`shopt -s promptvars`, `set -o posix`) or starting an interactive child bash that inherits the exported `PS1` makes bash expand the stored value and run the command substitution in it. An attacker who controls the prompt value gets command execution as the user who sources `bin/activate`. This is a regression. 21.14.8 escaped `$` and the backtick unconditionally and stays inert under the same sequence. The 21.14.9 fix for GHSA-6w3r-xr62-4xcp (#3418) rewrote that block and left bash with a path that stores the raw value whenever `promptvars` is off. ## Affected area Activation scripts (activate, activate.bat, activate.csh, activate.fish, activate.nu, Activate.ps1, activate.xsh) — specifically the bash `bin/activate`. ## Attacker-controlled input The `--prompt` value, which the security policy already lists as a value that may come from project metadata the user did not write. It reaches `virtualenv` as `--prompt` on the command line or as the `prompt` argument of the API, is written into `bin/activate` as the literal `VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT` assignment (correctly quoted, the value arrives there as data), and the script then copies it into `PS1` without escaping `$` or the backtick. Example: a repository or tool config supplies a prompt such as `x$(id > /tmp/ve-pwn)y`; the victim creates and later activates the environment. ## Details Source of the latest release: [`src/virtualenv/activation/bash/activate.sh` lines 140-160](https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/blob/21.14.12/src/virtualenv/activation/bash/activate.sh#L140-L160) ```sh if [ -z "${VIRTUAL_ENV_DISABLE_PROMPT-}" ] && { [ -n "${BASH_VERSION-}" ] || [ -n "${ZSH_VERSION-}" ]; }; then _OLD_VIRTUAL_PS1="${PS1-}" # bash expands PS1 after decoding its prompt escapes when promptvars is on or in posix mode, so the prompt holds a # reference to the variable and its value never reaches that expansion; otherwise only the decode runs and # backslashes need doubling. ... if [ -n "${BASH_VERSION-}" ] && { shopt -q promptvars || shopt -qo posix; }; then PS1='(${VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT-}) '"${PS1-}" else _VIRTUAL_PROMPT="${VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT//\\/\\\\}" if [ -n "${ZSH_VERSION-}" ]; then _VIRTUAL_PROMPT="${_VIRTUAL_PROMPT//\$/\\\$}" _VIRTUAL_PROMPT="${_VIRTUAL_PROMPT//\`/\\\`}" _VIRTUAL_PROMPT="${_VIRTUAL_PROMPT//\%/%%}" fi PS1="(${_VIRTUAL_PROMPT}) ${PS1-}" unset _VIRTUAL_PROMPT fi fi ``` Two separate mistakes combine: 1. A runtime shell option is treated as a constant. `shopt -u promptvars` at the moment of `source` does not bind the shell forever: `shopt -s promptvars` and `set -o posix` both re-enable PS1 expansion in the same shell. The code itself tests `shopt -qo posix` because posix mode expands the prompt regardless of `promptvars`, which shows the expansion state is not fixed by the activation. 2. The escaping that would keep the value inert in that mode is missing for bash. GHSA-5vjq-rrrf-7h2q ("activate runs commands from the environment name in zsh with PROMPT_SUBST") fixed exactly this shape for zsh, reasoning that "a user can set it after activation", by escaping `$` and the backtick. Bash lost the equivalent escaping in the same commit that added the zsh branch. The rendered prompt shows the regression directly: ``` 21.14.8 PS1 = (x\\$(id > /tmp/ve-pwn)y) <- escaped, inert 21.14.9 PS1 = (x$(id > /tmp/ve-pwn)y) <- raw value 21.14.12 PS1 = (x$(id > /tmp/ve-pwn)y) <- raw value ``` Relevant commit: [`5f48d711` "fix(bash): preserve literal prompts in supported shells (#3418)"](https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/commit/5f48d711731311428aebfae61d46957762155b22), which removed the unconditional `$`/backtick escaping from the bash path. Advisory for that change: [GHSA-6w3r-xr62-4xcp](https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/security/advisories/GHSA-6w3r-xr62-4xcp). ## Proof of concept Non-destructive payload: it runs `id` and writes the output to a file. ```bash python -m virtualenv --no-seed --no-periodic-update --activators bash \ --prompt 'x$(id > /tmp/ve-pwn)y' /tmp/venv-demo cat > /tmp/rc <<'EOF' shopt -u promptvars . /tmp/venv-demo/bin/activate shopt -s promptvars EOF # the prompt needs a tty; script(1) provides one printf 'exit\n' | script -qec 'bash --noprofile --rcfile /tmp/rc -i' /dev/null cat /tmp/ve-pwn ``` Observed on 21.14.12: ``` $ cat /tmp/ve-pwn uid=1000(asrun) gid=1000(asrun) groups=1000(asrun),4(adm),24(cdrom),27(sudo),30(dip),46(plugdev),999(ollama) ``` The prompt printed as `(xy)`. The same script against 21.14.8 creates no file; against 21.14.9 and 21.14.12 i

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…