CVE-2026-106069VulnerabilityPublished 27 Oct 2026Updated 5 Nov 2026

Node.js

Affects CiscoSource GCVE Database

Compare

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-106069· High 7.4

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.4 High.

Data as of 5 Nov 2026, 16:04 UTC

CVSS 3.0 base score

7.4High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none

CVSS scores by source
CNA (hackerone)	CVSS 3.0	7.4

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 5 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

cisco

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
nodejsnode	Affected >=22.23.3 <=22.23.3 >=24.22.0 <=24.22.0 >=26.12.0 <=26.12.0	Fixed in–

Description

Cisco is investigating its product line to determine which products may be affected by these vulnerabilities. As the investigation progresses, Cisco will update this advisory with information about affected products. The Vulnerable Products ["#vp"] section will include Cisco bug IDs for each affected product. The bugs are accessible through the Cisco Bug Search Tool ["https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/BUGID"] and contain additional platform-specific information, including workarounds (if available) and fixed software releases. Status of Cisco Priority Products The following table lists Cisco priority products and the status of the investigation into the impact of the vulnerabilities that are described in this advisory. Cisco Product Status Catalyst SD-WAN Software Not impacted Identity Services Engine (ISE) Not impacted IOS XE Software Not impacted IOS XR Software Not impacted NX-OS Software See the Impacted Products with Software Fixes and Products Confirmed Not Vulnerable tables Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software Not impacted Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software Not impacted Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Not Impacted Important: If a product is not listed within this advisory, Cisco's review indicates that the product is not affected by this vulnerability. Other Products Under Investigation The following products are also under active investigation to determine whether they are affected by the vulnerabilities that are described in this advisory. Application Observability AppDynamics AppDynamics Enterprise Console AppDynamics Virtual Appliance Collaboration and Social Media AI PODs for Collaboration Network and Content Security Devices Cryptographic Services PureCA (Private PKI CA) Hypershield Network Management and Provisioning BGP Traffic Engineering Controller Crosswork Hierarchical Controller Crosswork Workflow Manager Elastic Services Controller (ESC) Optical Network Controller Provider Connectivity Assurance Routing and Switching - Enterprise and Service Provider ASR 5000 Series Software (StarOS) Cloud Native Deployment Platform (CNDP) Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) NextFusion Platform Policy Suite (CPS) Ultra Packet Core - Redundancy Configuration Manager (RCM) Unified Computing HyperFlex HX Data Platform Video, Streaming, TelePresence, and Transcoding Devices Webex Desk Camera Voice and Unified Communications Devices Cloud Connect Wireless Connected Mobile Experiences (CMX) Cisco Cloud Hosted Services Cloud Native Application Observability Cloudlock IoT Operations Dashboard LMA Robust Intelligence RIME Secure Workload SaaS Security Cloud Sign On Smartlook ThousandEyes Vidcast Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Webex AI Agent Webex Assistant for Meetings Webex Collaboration Control Hub Webex Contact Center Webex Integrations and Bots Webex Interact Cisco Services Business Critical Insights CDT CX Cloud IQ Managed Services Platform Readiness Assessment Tool for Cloud Important: If a product is not listed within this advisory, Cisco's review indicates that the product is not affected by this vulnerability.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

Public exploits and detectionGitHub proofs of concept

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats