When a CA's parent lives on the same Krill server: instead of building and verifying a signed CMS message, it runs the
Source GCVE Database
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.4 High.
Data as of 2 Nov 2026, 19:29 UTC
Thin evidence
One scorer or none| CNA (NLnet Labs) | CVSS 3.1 | 8.4 |
|---|
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:LExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 2 Nov 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2 Nov 2026.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| NLnet LabsKrill | Affected– | Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
Until a fix is available, administrators should avoid configurations where a CA's parent and child reside on the same Krill server or implement additional verification controls if possible.
Description
A vulnerability in the Krill server occurs when a Certificate Authority's (CA) parent resides on the same server. Instead of properly building and verifying a signed CMS message, the server runs the RFC 6492 provisioning exchange in-process and trusts the child identity provided by the caller without verification. This flaw allows the parent CA to trust a child identity that may not actually belong to the CA making the request.