zebrad has mempool transaction admission denial via single-peer inbound queue saturation (CVE-2026-52732)
### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your node accepts inbound P2P connections (`network.listen_addr` is set, which is the default). 3. Your node's mempool is active (node is synced near the chain tip). All default configurations are affected. ### Summary A single unauthenticated P2P peer can monopolize all 25 inbound mempool download/verification slots (`MAX_INBOUND_CONCURRENCY`) by advertising fake transaction IDs. While the slots are occupied, all other inbound transactions from honest peers and local RPC `sendrawtransaction` calls are rejected with `MempoolError::FullQueue`. The attacker peer is never scored for misbehavior and is not disconnected, allowing sustained denial of mempool admission. ### Details The mempool download/verification pipeline at `zebrad/src/components/mempool/downloads.rs` uses a single bounded pool of 25 concurrent tasks. Three architectural gaps combine to produce the vulnerability: 1. No per-peer accounting: the 25 slots are shared across all peers with no cap on how many a single peer can hold. 2. No overload signaling: when `FullQueue` is returned, the inbound service at `zebrad/src/components/inbound.rs` maps it to `Response::Nil`, hiding the overload from the peer connection layer. The existing `handle_inbound_overload` disconnection logic never fires. 3. No misbehavior attribution: peer identity is not carried through the `Gossip` type into the download pipeline, so verification failures cannot be attributed to the originating peer. The attacker sends `inv` messages advertising fake transaction IDs. Zebra queues download tasks for each ID. The attacker stays silent; each slot is held until the `TRANSACTION_DOWNLOAD_TIMEOUT` (20 seconds) fires. The attacker periodically sends fresh `inv` waves to re-fill slots as they expire. Two additional slot-holding techniques have been independently demonstrated: invalid-prevout transactions that park in `AwaitOutput` for 60 seconds, and expensive shielded proof verification with auth-variant cache bypass. All three techniques are addressed by the same per-peer accounting fix. ### Patches zebrad 4.5.0 The fix adds per-peer queue accounting to the mempool download pipeline. A single peer is limited to a fraction of `MAX_INBOUND_CONCURRENCY` (e.g., 5 slots out of 25). `FullQueue` is surfaced as an overload signal to the peer connection layer. Peer identity is plumbed through the `Gossip` type for misbehavior attribution. ### Workarounds There is no complete configuration-level workaround. Reducing `network.peerset_initial_target_size` limits the total inbound peer count but does not prevent a single peer from holding all mempool slots. ### Impact Mempool transaction admission is denied for all honest peers and local RPC clients while the attack is sustained. Block validation and chain synchronization continue normally. The attacker needs only one TCP connection and minimal bandwidth (~1 KB/s of fake `inv` messages). The node recovers immediately when the attacker stops. This does not affect consensus, funds, or on-disk state. ### Credit Reported by `@dingledropper` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
zebrad's mempool download and verification pipeline uses a shared pool of 25 concurrent slots for inbound transaction processing. Due to architectural gaps—no per-peer slot limits, no overload signaling to disconnect peers, and no attribution of verification failures to peers—a single unauthenticated peer can monopolize all slots by sending fake transaction IDs in inv messages. These slots remain occupied until timeouts expire, causing all other inbound transactions and local RPC sendrawtransaction calls to be rejected with a FullQueue error. The attacker is not penalized or disconnected, enabling sustained denial of mempool admission. The vulnerability affects all default configurations with inbound P2P enabled and active mempool. zebrad 4.5.0 fixes this by implementing per-peer slot limits (e.g., 5 of 25 slots per peer), surfacing FullQueue as an overload signal to trigger disconnection, and associating peer identity with verification tasks for misbehavior scoring.
Potential Impact
Denial of service on mempool transaction admission for all honest peers and local RPC clients while the attack persists. Block validation and chain synchronization continue unaffected. The attacker requires only a single TCP connection and minimal bandwidth (~1 KB/s). There is no impact on consensus, funds, or on-disk blockchain state. The node recovers immediately after the attack stops.
Mitigation Recommendations
An official fix is available in zebrad version 4.5.0, which adds per-peer queue accounting, overload signaling, and misbehavior attribution to prevent this denial of service. Users should upgrade to zebrad 4.5.0 or later. There is no complete configuration-level workaround; reducing inbound peer count limits total peers but does not prevent a single peer from saturating mempool slots.
zebrad has mempool transaction admission denial via single-peer inbound queue saturation (CVE-2026-52732)
Description
### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your node accepts inbound P2P connections (`network.listen_addr` is set, which is the default). 3. Your node's mempool is active (node is synced near the chain tip). All default configurations are affected. ### Summary A single unauthenticated P2P peer can monopolize all 25 inbound mempool download/verification slots (`MAX_INBOUND_CONCURRENCY`) by advertising fake transaction IDs. While the slots are occupied, all other inbound transactions from honest peers and local RPC `sendrawtransaction` calls are rejected with `MempoolError::FullQueue`. The attacker peer is never scored for misbehavior and is not disconnected, allowing sustained denial of mempool admission. ### Details The mempool download/verification pipeline at `zebrad/src/components/mempool/downloads.rs` uses a single bounded pool of 25 concurrent tasks. Three architectural gaps combine to produce the vulnerability: 1. No per-peer accounting: the 25 slots are shared across all peers with no cap on how many a single peer can hold. 2. No overload signaling: when `FullQueue` is returned, the inbound service at `zebrad/src/components/inbound.rs` maps it to `Response::Nil`, hiding the overload from the peer connection layer. The existing `handle_inbound_overload` disconnection logic never fires. 3. No misbehavior attribution: peer identity is not carried through the `Gossip` type into the download pipeline, so verification failures cannot be attributed to the originating peer. The attacker sends `inv` messages advertising fake transaction IDs. Zebra queues download tasks for each ID. The attacker stays silent; each slot is held until the `TRANSACTION_DOWNLOAD_TIMEOUT` (20 seconds) fires. The attacker periodically sends fresh `inv` waves to re-fill slots as they expire. Two additional slot-holding techniques have been independently demonstrated: invalid-prevout transactions that park in `AwaitOutput` for 60 seconds, and expensive shielded proof verification with auth-variant cache bypass. All three techniques are addressed by the same per-peer accounting fix. ### Patches zebrad 4.5.0 The fix adds per-peer queue accounting to the mempool download pipeline. A single peer is limited to a fraction of `MAX_INBOUND_CONCURRENCY` (e.g., 5 slots out of 25). `FullQueue` is surfaced as an overload signal to the peer connection layer. Peer identity is plumbed through the `Gossip` type for misbehavior attribution. ### Workarounds There is no complete configuration-level workaround. Reducing `network.peerset_initial_target_size` limits the total inbound peer count but does not prevent a single peer from holding all mempool slots. ### Impact Mempool transaction admission is denied for all honest peers and local RPC clients while the attack is sustained. Block validation and chain synchronization continue normally. The attacker needs only one TCP connection and minimal bandwidth (~1 KB/s of fake `inv` messages). The node recovers immediately when the attacker stops. This does not affect consensus, funds, or on-disk state. ### Credit Reported by `@dingledropper` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.
CVSS v3.1
Score 5.3medium
Affected software
Run on your own infrastructure? Check whether these packages are installed with threat-finder — our free open-source scanner.
Weaknesses
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
zebrad's mempool download and verification pipeline uses a shared pool of 25 concurrent slots for inbound transaction processing. Due to architectural gaps—no per-peer slot limits, no overload signaling to disconnect peers, and no attribution of verification failures to peers—a single unauthenticated peer can monopolize all slots by sending fake transaction IDs in inv messages. These slots remain occupied until timeouts expire, causing all other inbound transactions and local RPC sendrawtransaction calls to be rejected with a FullQueue error. The attacker is not penalized or disconnected, enabling sustained denial of mempool admission. The vulnerability affects all default configurations with inbound P2P enabled and active mempool. zebrad 4.5.0 fixes this by implementing per-peer slot limits (e.g., 5 of 25 slots per peer), surfacing FullQueue as an overload signal to trigger disconnection, and associating peer identity with verification tasks for misbehavior scoring.
Potential Impact
Denial of service on mempool transaction admission for all honest peers and local RPC clients while the attack persists. Block validation and chain synchronization continue unaffected. The attacker requires only a single TCP connection and minimal bandwidth (~1 KB/s). There is no impact on consensus, funds, or on-disk blockchain state. The node recovers immediately after the attack stops.
Mitigation Recommendations
An official fix is available in zebrad version 4.5.0, which adds per-peer queue accounting, overload signaling, and misbehavior attribution to prevent this denial of service. Users should upgrade to zebrad 4.5.0 or later. There is no complete configuration-level workaround; reducing inbound peer count limits total peers but does not prevent a single peer from saturating mempool slots.
Technical Details
- Gcve Source
- db.gcve.eu
- Osv Id
- GHSA-4fc2-h7jh-287c
- Osv Schema Version
- 1.4.0
- Aliases
- ["CVE-2026-52732"]
- Ecosystems
- ["crates.io"]
- Database Specific Severity
- MODERATE
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
Threat ID: 6a46ecb727e9c7971943ca1f
Added to database: 07/02/2026, 22:56:55 UTC
Last enriched: 07/02/2026, 23:11:46 UTC
Last updated: 07/31/2026, 12:27:30 UTC
Views: 90
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.