HCL vulnerabilities and threats

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since It was found that a malicious actor can use brute-force techniques to either guess or confirm valid users in the system. Use renumeration is when a malicious actor can use brute-force techniques to either guess or confirm valid users in a system

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since HTTP OPTIONS method is enabled on this web server. The OPTIONS method provides a list of the methods that are supported by the Web server which allows an attacker to narrow and intensify their efforts.

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the application returns detailed error messages that leak information about the processing on the server. An attacker may use the contents of error messages to help launch another ,more focused attack.

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the application does not have an appropriate caching policy specifying the extent to which the page and its form fields should be cached. If sensitive information in application responses is stored in the local cache, then this may be retrieved by other users who have access to the same computer at a future time.

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the Application is vulnerable to Lucky 13. that makes the SS LLUCKY13 possible affects the TLS1.1and 1.2 and DTLS1.0 or 1.2 implementations . It also affects previous versions such as SSL3.0 and TLS1.0. This can also be considered a type of man-in-the-middle attack.

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attacks since the server software version used by the application is revealed by the web server. Displaying version information of software could allow an attacker to determine which vulnerabilities are present in the software, particularly if an outdated software version is in use with published vulnerabilities.

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to email flooding as the application does not have a proper mail limitation mechanism at Forget Password functionality. The actor could b e a human or an automated process such as a virus or bot. This could be used to cause a denial of service, compromise program logic or other consequences.

HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to brute force attacks since application doesn’t have captcha implemented. It can lead to various security issues like brute force , automated attacks & account enumeration

HCL Aftermarket EPC is affected by Sensitive Information in GET method & in URL which allows application to pass sensitive data via URL parameters during normal usage. Data passed in this manner can be exposed because it may end up stored in unintended locations, including server logs, local browser history and proxy logs.

HCL Aftermarket EPC is affected by Business Logic Vulnerability using which a non valid user of the application can obtain passwords from the server and redirect them to their own email address by manipulating the server's response. The application includes checks in the initial requests to verify the validity of the provided UserId, but similar validation is not applied to Email requests when sending passwords to user emails.

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a DLL hijacking vulnerability which could allow an attacker to modify or replace the application with malicious content.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Internal File Path Disclosure vulnerability. The application dashboard inadvertently leaks sensitive information regarding its internal file structure and directory paths through unhandled error messages, system logs, or debugging output, which could allow a remote attacker to map the underlying server environment and identify targets for further exploitation.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Buffer Overflow vulnerability that can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS). The application fails to properly validate input sizes, allowing an attacker to pass an excessive amount of information into a memory container, which can cause the system to crash or become unresponsive. To mitigate this flaw, comprehensive input length checks must be implemented and enforced on both the client and server sides.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. These legacy protocols contain numerous cryptographic design flaws that expose data to interception and decryption. To remediate this risk, the application must disable all support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, and exclusively enable support for secure protocols, specifically TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Account Takeover via Response Manipulation vulnerability. A remote attacker can intercept and alter the contents of the server's HTTP responses before they reach the client application, allowing them to manipulate the authentication or authorization logic to bypass controls and gain unauthorized access to targeted user accounts.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing HTTP Strict-Transport-Security Header vulnerability. The application fails to implement the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) policy within its responses, which could allow a remote attacker to downgrade the communication channel to an unencrypted connection (HTTP) and conduct man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. To remediate this, the application must include the "Strict-Transport-Security" header in all web application responses.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing SameSite Attribute vulnerability. The application fails to set the "SameSite" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to execute Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks if additional mitigations, such as Anti-CSRF tokens, are not implemented.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Internal IP Address Disclosure vulnerability. The application includes internal IP address details within its generated server responses, which could allow a remote attacker to gather sensitive network topology information and use it to map the internal infrastructure for further targeted attacks.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Login Replay Attack vulnerability. The application allows a remote attacker to intercept, delay, or fraudulently retransmit valid authentication data to achieve unauthorized access. To mitigate this risk, the application must implement a mechanism to include timestamps with every message, ensuring that messages exceeding a specific age threshold are automatically rejected by the recipient system.

HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing Secure Attribute in Encrypted Session (SSL) Cookie vulnerability. The application fails to set the "secure" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and capture sensitive cookies, session tokens, or credentials sent in cleartext over unencrypted channels.