Threat Intelligence Database
Comprehensive database of the latest cyber threats affecting organizations worldwide. Filter and search to find specific threat intelligence relevant to your organization.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threat Intelligence
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
Zebra rpc: zebrad has full node denial of service via non-ASCII LongPollId in getblocktemplate (CVE-2026-52731)CVE-2026-52731 0 ### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your `zebrad.toml` sets `rpc.listen_addr` to a TCP address (RPC server is enabled). 3. An attacker can authenticate to the RPC endpoint. With the default `enable_cookie_auth = true`, this requires the attacker to read the `.cookie` file. With `enable_cookie_auth = false`, any network client reaching the RPC port can trigger it. ### Summary The `getblocktemplate` RPC handler panics when parsing a `LongPollId` parameter that contains non-ASCII (multi-byte UTF-8) characters. The handler performs byte-index string slicing on the user-supplied string, which panics in Rust when a byte index falls within a multi-byte character boundary. Because Zebra's release profile sets `panic = "abort"`, the panic terminates the entire node process. ### Details The `getblocktemplate` handler receives a user-supplied `LongPollId` string and slices it at fixed byte offsets to extract the encoded tip hash and tip height. When the string contains multi-byte UTF-8 characters, a byte-index slice can land in the middle of a character, causing Rust's `str` indexing to panic with "byte index is not a char boundary." Under the `panic = "abort"` release profile, this panic terminates the entire `zebrad` process rather than just the RPC task. ### Patches zebra-rpc 8.0.0 and zebrad 4.5.0. Replace byte-index string slicing with character-aware parsing or validate that the `LongPollId` string contains only ASCII characters before slicing. ### Workarounds - Disable the RPC server by removing `rpc.listen_addr` from `zebrad.toml`. - Ensure `enable_cookie_auth = true` (the default) and restrict filesystem access to the `.cookie` file. - Place a reverse proxy in front of the RPC port that validates `LongPollId` parameters are ASCII-only before forwarding. ### Impact A single authenticated RPC request terminates the `zebrad` process. Same impact profile as GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3: repeatable on restart, affects mining pools and infrastructure that forward `getblocktemplate` calls. ### Credit Reported by `@sangsoo-osec` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 07/02/2026, 19:28:03 UTC Added: 07/02/2026, 22:56:57 UTC |
Zebra rpc: zebrad vulnerable to full node denial of service via crafted Sapling receiver in z_listunifiedreceivers 0 ### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your `zebrad.toml` sets `rpc.listen_addr` to a TCP address (RPC server is enabled). 3. An attacker can authenticate to the RPC endpoint. With the default `enable_cookie_auth = true`, this requires the attacker to read the `.cookie` file (typically local access). With `enable_cookie_auth = false`, any network client reaching the RPC port can trigger it. ### Summary The `z_listunifiedreceivers` RPC handler panics when processing a structurally valid Unified Address whose Sapling receiver carries 43 bytes that fail cryptographic validation (`sapling_crypto::PaymentAddress::from_bytes` returns `None` for non-subgroup Jubjub points). The handler calls `.expect("using data already decoded as valid")` on the fallible result. Because Zebra's release profile sets `panic = "abort"`, the panic terminates the entire node process, not just the RPC task. ### Details `zcash_address::unified::Encoding::decode` validates only the structural envelope of a Unified Address (F4Jumble, bech32m, typecode ordering, 43-byte length for Sapling). It does not validate that the embedded `pk_d` is a valid Jubjub subgroup point or that the diversifier produces a valid `g_d` preimage. At `zebra-rpc/src/methods.rs:2893`, the handler calls `Address::try_from_sapling(network, data)`, which delegates to `sapling_crypto::PaymentAddress::from_bytes`. When `from_bytes` returns `None` (most random 32-byte strings fail the subgroup check), the `.expect()` fires and the process aborts. The same crate already handles this correctly in `try_from_unified` at `zebra-chain/src/primitives/address.rs:99-110`, which returns `Err` when `from_bytes` fails. The vulnerable code path bypasses this validated route. ### Patches zebra-rpc 8.0.0 and zebrad 4.5.0. Replace `.expect()` with `.map_err(|e| ErrorObject::owned(...))` for proper error propagation, or route through the existing `try_from_unified` path which already handles this case correctly. ### Workarounds - Disable the RPC server by removing `rpc.listen_addr` from `zebrad.toml`. - Ensure `enable_cookie_auth = true` (the default) and restrict filesystem access to the `.cookie` file. - Place a reverse proxy in front of the RPC port that rejects `z_listunifiedreceivers` calls with untrusted address parameters. ### Impact A single authenticated RPC request terminates the `zebrad` process. The attack is repeatable on restart (the same request triggers the same abort), allowing an attacker to keep the node down indefinitely until the request is filtered upstream. Operators using `lightwalletd` backends, Zaino indexers, or mining pool infrastructure that forward RPC calls to `zebrad` may be exposed if the forwarding path passes through `z_listunifiedreceivers`. ### Credit Reported by `@robustfengbin` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 07/02/2026, 19:37:58 UTC Added: 07/02/2026, 22:56:55 UTC |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 results