Threat Intelligence Database
Comprehensive database of the latest cyber threats affecting organizations worldwide. Filter and search to find specific threat intelligence relevant to your organization.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threat Intelligence
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
0 `src/main/java/org/springframework/data/mapping/context/PersistentPropertyPathFactory.java:175` · Unbounded Resource Allocation (Algorithmic DoS) ### Impact When a consuming module routes user-supplied dot-paths (sort parameters, projection paths, PATCH paths) through `MappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class)`, each distinct string — including invalid ones — is cached forever. A remote attacker can send millions of requests with unique `?sort=aaaa<n>` values and grow the heap until the service OOMs. ### Description `PersistentPropertyPathFactory.propertyPaths` (line 53) is a `ConcurrentHashMap<TypeAndPath, PathResolution>` populated by `getPotentiallyCachedPath()` (line 174-177) via `computeIfAbsent`. The key is `(TypeInformation, rawPathString)`. Crucially, unresolvable paths are also cached (as `PathResolution.unresolved`, line 204) so that the same `InvalidPersistentPropertyPath` can be re-thrown — meaning every distinct garbage string an attacker sends creates a permanent entry. There is no eviction. This is reachable from `AbstractMappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class)` (`AbstractMappingContext.java:345`), which Spring Data REST and several store query mappers call with HTTP-request-derived sort/filter property names. By contrast, the sibling `SimplePropertyPath.cache` was already hardened to use `ConcurrentReferenceHashMap` (soft refs); this cache was not given the same treatment. ### Exploit scenario Against a Spring Data REST endpoint, an attacker scripts `GET /things?sort=<random-40-char-string>` in a loop. Each request fails fast with `InvalidPersistentPropertyPath`, but each distinct random string leaves behind a `TypeAndPath` key, a `PathResolution` object holding the split segments list, and the source string in the map. After ~10M requests the JVM OOMs. ### Preconditions - A downstream component (Spring Data REST, a store-specific `QueryMapper`, or application code) passes externally-supplied strings to `MappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...)` - No upstream rate-limiting or path-string validation ### How to fix A cache whose key can be derived from external input must be bounded. Replace `propertyPaths` (line 53) with a `ConcurrentLruCache<TypeAndPath, PathResolution>` of fixed capacity, or `ConcurrentReferenceHashMap` (matching the sibling `SimplePropertyPath.cache`). Additionally, do not cache `PathResolution.unresolved` results at all (line 204 in `createPersistentPropertyPath`) — re-computing a failed lookup is cheap, and caching negative results for arbitrary attacker strings is what makes this exploitable. ### Adversarial verification **Verdict:** TRUE_POSITIVE (confidence: 7/10) — unbounded hard-ref `ConcurrentHashMap` keyed by raw path string, caches unresolved entries (line 204), reachable via public `MappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...)`; sibling `PropertyPath` cache was already converted to soft-refs but this one was missed. -3 confidence because the HTTP-input wiring lives in downstream modules (Spring Data REST / store mappers), not verifiable in this repo. **Code at the line — CONFIRMED** - Line 53: `private final Map<TypeAndPath, PathResolution> propertyPaths = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();` — plain CHM, hard refs, no eviction, no size bound. - Line 175: `propertyPaths.computeIfAbsent(TypeAndPath.of(type, propertyPath), ...)` — every distinct `(type, string)` pair is inserted. - Line 204: `return PathResolution.unresolved(parts, segment, type, currentPath);` — returned from inside `computeIfAbsent`'s mapping function, so unresolvable paths are cached. The `PathResolution` retains the full attacker string (`source = StringUtils.collectionToDelimitedString(parts, ".")`, line 452). **Callers within spring-data-commons** - `AbstractMappingContext.getPersistentPropertyPath(String, Class<?>)` (line 345) and `(String, TypeInformation<?>)` (line 350) → `persistentPropertyPathFactory.from(type, propertyPath)` → straight into the unbounded cache. No validation, no `PropertyPath.from` gate. - This is the public `MappingContext` interface (`MappingContext.java:174,186`), documented to throw `InvalidPersistentPropertyPath` on bad input — i.e., the contract explicitly anticipates being called with possibly-invalid strings. - No in-repo caller routes HTTP input directly into the `String` overload. The `Sort.Order.property` → `getPersistentPropertyPath(String, ...)` bridge lives in store modules (Spring Data MongoDB `QueryMapper`, Spring Data REST sort translator). That wiring is out-of-repo as the finding states. **Protections — NONE on this cache** Contrast: `SimplePropertyPath.java:52` (the `PropertyPath.from` cache) uses `ConcurrentReferenceHashMap` (soft refs, GC-evictable). Spring already hardened the sibling cache against exactly this pattern. `PersistentPropertyPathFactory.propertyPaths` was not given the same treatment. **Stress-test** Is this exclusion #3 (intended design)? The `PathResolution` javadoc (line Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 07/31/2026, 16:44:15 UTC Added: 06/09/2026, 23:55:46 UTC |
0 Spring Data Commons contains a vulnerability that can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition if Spring Data Web Support is enabled in conjunction with a Controller method using @ProjectedPayload, when an attacker sends a specially crafted HTTP request that causes the application to allocate lots of memory. Affected versions: Spring Data Commons 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.2.0 through 3.2.15; 3.1.0 through 3.1.14; 3.0.0 through 3.0.15; 2.7.0 through 2.7.19. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/10/2026, 00:31:52 UTC Added: 06/09/2026, 23:55:50 UTC |
0 Spring Data's internal property-lookup cache accepts and permanently retains attacker-supplied strings as cache keys, allowing heap exhaustion through repeated requests. Affected versions: Spring Data Commons 2.7.0 through 2.7.19; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 4.0.0 through 4.0.5. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/10/2026, 00:31:51 UTC Added: 06/09/2026, 23:55:50 UTC |
0 Applications using Spring Data Commons may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack leading to a StackOverflowException when parsing Sort parameters. Affected versions: Spring Data Commons 4.0.0 through 4.0.5; 3.5.0 through 3.5.11; 3.4.0 through 3.4.14; 3.3.0 through 3.3.16; 3.2.0 through 3.2.15; 3.1.0 through 3.1.14; 3.0.0 through 3.0.15; 2.7.0 through 2.7.19. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/10/2026, 00:31:51 UTC Added: 06/09/2026, 23:55:50 UTC |
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 results