Threats Tagged 'cve-2025-40169'
View all threats tagged with 'cve-2025-40169'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'cve-2025-40169'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
A vulnerability in the Linux kernel's BPF verifier allowed negative offsets in ALU operation instructions due to improper validation of the signed 16-bit offset field. This flaw permitted malformed BPF programs with offsets other than the explicitly allowed 0 or 1, potentially leading to high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The issue has been resolved by tightening the validation logic to reject any offset values other than 0 and 1. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 11/12/2025, 12:30:28 UTC Added: 07/30/2026, 15:50:45 UTC |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops When verifying BPF programs, the check_alu_op() function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer. The existing check 'insn->off > 1' was intended to ensure the offset is either 0, or 1 for BPF_MOD/BPF_DIV. However, because 'insn->off' is signed, this check incorrectly accepts all negative values (e.g., -1). This commit tightens the validation by changing the condition to '(insn->off != 0 && insn->off != 1)'. This ensures that any value other than the explicitly permitted 0 and 1 is rejected, hardening the verifier against malformed BPF programs. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 11/12/2025, 11:15:00 UTC Added: 07/18/2026, 11:37:23 UTC |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 results