Threats Tagged 'cve-2025-40201'
View all threats tagged with 'cve-2025-40201'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'cve-2025-40201'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
A race condition vulnerability in the Linux kernel's sys_prlimit64() function involving improper locking of task group leaders has been resolved. The issue arises from unsafe usage of task_lock(tsk->group_leader), which can lead to accessing freed task_struct objects or taking incorrect locks due to concurrent changes in group_leader. This can cause serious kernel-level integrity and availability issues. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 11/13/2025, 00:30:18 UTC Added: 07/30/2026, 15:50:45 UTC |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kernel/sys.c: fix the racy usage of task_lock(tsk->group_leader) in sys_prlimit64() paths The usage of task_lock(tsk->group_leader) in sys_prlimit64()->do_prlimit() path is very broken. sys_prlimit64() does get_task_struct(tsk) but this only protects task_struct itself. If tsk != current and tsk is not a leader, this process can exit/exec and task_lock(tsk->group_leader) may use the already freed task_struct. Another problem is that sys_prlimit64() can race with mt-exec which changes ->group_leader. In this case do_prlimit() may take the wrong lock, or (worse) ->group_leader may change between task_lock() and task_unlock(). Change sys_prlimit64() to take tasklist_lock when necessary. This is not nice, but I don't see a better fix for -stable. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 11/12/2025, 22:15:00 UTC Added: 07/18/2026, 11:37:01 UTC |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 results