Threats Tagged 'cve-2025-68379'
View all threats tagged with 'cve-2025-68379'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'cve-2025-68379'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
A null pointer dereference vulnerability in the Linux kernel's RDMA rxe driver was resolved. The issue occurs when ibv_modify_srq() is called twice consecutively under certain error conditions, leading to a null dereference and kernel crash. This happens because a failed resize sets srq->rq.queue to NULL, and the subsequent call dereferences this null pointer. The vulnerability could cause denial of service due to kernel crashes. Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 12/24/2025, 12:30:30 UTC Added: 07/30/2026, 15:50:43 UTC |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rxe: Fix null deref on srq->rq.queue after resize failure A NULL pointer dereference can occur in rxe_srq_chk_attr() when ibv_modify_srq() is invoked twice in succession under certain error conditions. The first call may fail in rxe_queue_resize(), which leads rxe_srq_from_attr() to set srq->rq.queue = NULL. The second call then triggers a crash (null deref) when accessing srq->rq.queue->buf->index_mask. Call Trace: <TASK> rxe_modify_srq+0x170/0x480 [rdma_rxe] ? __pfx_rxe_modify_srq+0x10/0x10 [rdma_rxe] ? uverbs_try_lock_object+0x4f/0xa0 [ib_uverbs] ? rdma_lookup_get_uobject+0x1f0/0x380 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_modify_srq+0x204/0x290 [ib_uverbs] ? __pfx_ib_uverbs_modify_srq+0x10/0x10 [ib_uverbs] ? tryinc_node_nr_active+0xe6/0x150 ? uverbs_fill_udata+0xed/0x4f0 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0x2c0/0x470 [ib_uverbs] ? __pfx_ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0x10/0x10 [ib_uverbs] ? uverbs_fill_udata+0xed/0x4f0 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_run_method+0x55a/0x6e0 [ib_uverbs] ? __pfx_ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0x10/0x10 [ib_uverbs] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0x54d/0x800 [ib_uverbs] ? __pfx_ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0x10/0x10 [ib_uverbs] ? __pfx___raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_do_vfs_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? ioctl_has_perm.constprop.0.isra.0+0x2c7/0x4c0 ? __pfx_ioctl_has_perm.constprop.0.isra.0+0x10/0x10 ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x13e/0x220 [ib_uverbs] ? __pfx_ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [ib_uverbs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x138/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x82/0x250 ? fdget_pos+0x58/0x4c0 ? ksys_write+0xf3/0x1c0 ? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10 ? do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x250 ? __pfx_vm_mmap_pgoff+0x10/0x10 ? fget+0x173/0x230 ? fput+0x2a/0x80 ? ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x224/0x4c0 ? do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x250 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x37b/0xfe0 ? clear_bhb_loop+0x50/0xa0 ? clear_bhb_loop+0x50/0xa0 ? clear_bhb_loop+0x50/0xa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 12/24/2025, 11:16:00 UTC Added: 07/18/2026, 11:32:24 UTC |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 results