Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.

Threats Tagged 'cve-2026-63751'

View all threats tagged with 'cve-2026-63751'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.

Pro Console Lifetime

Stop chasing alerts. Route them.

Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.

Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)

View Plans & Pricing

API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now

Filter Threats

Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries

Search threats by title, CVE ID, or description. Maximum 100 characters.
Active filters (1):Tag: cve-2026-63751

Threats Tagged 'cve-2026-63751'

Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations

SurrealDB has bypass of field-level SELECT permissions through JSON Patch `copy` and `move` with empty `from` (CVE-2026-63751)CVE-2026-63751
0

SurrealDB lets callers modify records using JSON Patch operations via the `UPDATE … PATCH` statement (and SDK equivalents such as `db.patch()`). One of those operations is `copy`, which duplicates one field's value into another field of the same record. A `PATCH` with an empty `from` — for example, `UPDATE thing:1 PATCH [{ op: 'copy', from: '', path: '/leak' }]` — was treated as "copy the entire record" and duplicated every field, including fields the caller has no permission to read, into the destination field the caller chose. The permission filter that hides protected field values from the response only knew to hide the *original* protected field names, not the new destinations, so the protected values were returned to the caller intact under the new field name. ### Impact An authenticated user with permission to issue `UPDATE … PATCH` against a record could read the values of any field on that record, regardless of field-level `PERMISSIONS FOR select` restrictions. The leak is confidentiality-only, and bounded to the fields of the single record the caller targets per PATCH request — it does not expose other records on the same table or any data outside that record's scope. ### Patches A patch has been introduced that rejects an empty `from` pointer at parse time for both `copy` and `move` operations. - Versions 3.1.0 and later are not affected by this issue. ### Workarounds Affected users who are unable to update should restrict `UPDATE … PATCH` to callers who already hold SELECT permission on every field of the target record — for them, the bug exposes nothing they can't already read. Otherwise, switch the mutation to an explicit `SET` or `MERGE` clause, which removes the attack surface since neither form accepts JSON Patch operations.

Join the discussion

Showing 1 to 1 of 1 result

Filters:Tag: cve-2026-63751
Page 1 of 1
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses