Threats Tagged 'ghsa-w6r9-248c-frg8'
View all threats tagged with 'ghsa-w6r9-248c-frg8'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'ghsa-w6r9-248c-frg8'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
0 ## Summary The frame-size mitigation released in `amqp091-go` v1.13.0 can be bypassed before `connection.tune` completes. A malicious or compromised AMQP peer can send only a seven-byte body-frame header containing a large attacker-controlled `uint32` payload length. The client allocates a slice of that declared length before it verifies that the payload exists or rejects the frame for its invalid protocol state. The bypass occurs because `Connection.maxFrameSize` starts at zero. The reader interprets zero as both “negotiated unlimited” and “not negotiated yet,” and skips the pre-allocation size check in either case. `Open` starts the reader goroutine before negotiation and does not store a limit until after it receives `connection.tune`. This remains reachable even if the caller explicitly uses `Config{FrameSize: frameMinSize}`. A malicious broker can therefore cause excessive memory allocation, potentially terminating the Go client process through memory exhaustion, before authentication and connection setup complete. ## Relationship to the existing advisory [GHSA-r9c8-gcjp-xfwh](https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/security/advisories/GHSA-r9c8-gcjp-xfwh) describes attacker-controlled, unbounded allocation by a malicious broker and identifies v1.13.0 as the patched version. [Pull request 369](https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/pull/369) added a frame-size check before parser allocation, but the check is active only when the stored maximum is nonzero. The v1.13.0 source still: 1. starts the reader before protocol negotiation; 2. skips the bound while `maxFrameSize == 0`; 3. allocates the body using the peer-declared size; and 4. stores the negotiated maximum only after `connection.tune`. This appears to be an incomplete-fix or state-boundary bypass of the existing advisory rather than an unrelated allocation issue. ## Affected source and root cause The issue was reproduced at commit [`9313fd9ea47bdb4e8f7f5db9bef94d5534d0bdde`](https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/commit/9313fd9ea47bdb4e8f7f5db9bef94d5534d0bdde), dated 2026-07-30. The same relevant control flow is in the v1.13.0 tag. The vulnerable sequence is: 1. [`Open` starts `c.reader(conn)` before calling `c.open(config)`](https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/blob/9313fd9ea47bdb4e8f7f5db9bef94d5534d0bdde/connection.go#L373-L392). 2. [The reader receives a pointer to the initially zero-valued `c.maxFrameSize`](https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/blob/9313fd9ea47bdb4e8f7f5db9bef94d5534d0bdde/connection.go#L971-L979). 3. [`ReadFrame` decodes the peer-controlled `uint32` size but rejects it only when `max > 0`](https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/blob/9313fd9ea47bdb4e8f7f5db9bef94d5534d0bdde/read.go#L46-L79). 4. [`parseBodyFrame` executes `make([]byte, size)` before `io.ReadFull`](https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/blob/9313fd9ea47bdb4e8f7f5db9bef94d5534d0bdde/read.go#L459-L466). 5. [`maxFrameSize` is first stored after processing `connection.tune`](https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/blob/9313fd9ea47bdb4e8f7f5db9bef94d5534d0bdde/connection.go#L1297-L1305). The source comments and regression tests explicitly combine “negotiated unlimited” with “not yet negotiated” as the same zero state. Those states need different security behavior. ## Safe reproduction This reproducer does not start RabbitMQ, contact any hosted service, send a large payload, or attempt to crash the process. It declares a 2 MiB body and observes the size of the slice passed to the transport's payload `Read`. Receiving a 2 MiB destination slice proves that the allocation occurred; the test then releases the blocked read and exits. 1. Check out v1.13.0. 2. Save the following as `pre_negotiation_frame_limit_test.go` in the repository root. 3. Run `go test -run '^TestPreNegotiationFrameLimitBypass$' -count=1 -v .`. ```go package amqp091 import ( "encoding/binary" "io" "sync" "testing" "time" ) const declaredBodySize = 2 << 20 type stagedFrameConn struct { mu sync.Mutex header []byte headerRead bool bodyRead chan int bodyOnce sync.Once release chan struct{} releaseOnce sync.Once } func newStagedFrameConn() *stagedFrameConn { header := make([]byte, 7) header[0] = frameBody binary.BigEndian.PutUint16(header[1:3], 1) binary.BigEndian.PutUint32(header[3:7], declaredBodySize) return &stagedFrameConn{ header: header, bodyRead: make(chan int, 1), release: make(chan struct{}), } } func (c *stagedFrameConn) Read(p []byte) (int, error) { c.mu.Lock() if !c.headerRead { c.headerRead = true n := copy(p, c.header) c.mu.Unlock() return n, nil } c.mu.Unlock() c.bodyOnce.Do(func() { c.bodyRead <- len(p) }) <-c.release return 0, io.EOF } func (c *stagedFrameConn) Write(p []byte) (int, error) { return len(p), nil } func (c *stagedFrameConn) Close() error { c.releaseOnce.Do(func() { close(c.release) }) return nil } func TestPreNegotiationFrameLimitBypass(t *testing.T) { conn := newStagedFrameConn Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 10/08/2026, 19:40:19 UTC Added: 10/08/2026, 20:37:07 UTC |
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 result