Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2024-5953: A denial of service vulnerability was found in the 389-ds-base LDAP server

Source GCVE Database

0
Compare
Authoritative record:CVE-2024-5953· Medium 5.7

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.7 Medium · fixed in 9.2.1 : update affected systems when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 00:35 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
5.7Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
Patch
Available – fixed in 9.2.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 18 Jun 2024

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

What to do

AI-suggested

Red Hat has released a security update for 389-ds-base in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support that fixes this vulnerability. Users should apply the update as described in Red Hat advisory RHSA-2024:4633. After applying the update, the 389 server service will be restarted automatically. No additional mitigation steps are required beyond applying the official patch.

Description

CVE-2024-5953 is a denial of service vulnerability in the 389-ds-base LDAP server that can be triggered by an authenticated user attempting to log in with a malformed password hash. This causes the server to crash, resulting in denial of service. The issue affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support versions of 389-ds-base. A security update addressing this vulnerability has been released by Red Hat.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…