stunnel-5.80-1.1 on GA media
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) bypass vulnerability exists in stunnel versions 5.79 and earlier when configured with the non-default 'protocol = socks' setting. This flaw allows an attacker who can reach the SOCKS proxy to bypass localhost restrictions by using IPv4-mapped IPv6 or unspecified addresses, potentially accessing services bound to the local interface that should not be network-accessible. Exploitation depends on the presence and security of such local services. The vulnerability has a medium severity rating.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-70367 is an SSRF bypass vulnerability in stunnel versions up to 5.79 when configured in SOCKS proxy mode. The issue arises because the SOCKS proxy improperly handles IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (e.g., ::ffff:127.0.0.1) and unspecified addresses (0.0.0.0, ::), allowing clients to circumvent intended localhost access restrictions. This can expose loopback-only services on the stunnel host to network access via the SOCKS proxy. The vulnerability requires the 'protocol = socks' configuration, which is not enabled by default. Exploitation depends on the local services bound to localhost and the network environment. The CVSS v3.1 base score assigned by Red Hat is 5.4 (medium severity) with low attack complexity and low privileges required.
Potential Impact
An attacker able to reach the stunnel SOCKS proxy can bypass localhost restrictions and access services bound to the local interface of the stunnel host that should not be reachable externally. This could lead to unauthorized information disclosure or unauthorized command execution depending on the local services exposed. The overall impact is limited by the requirement that the SOCKS proxy is enabled and accessible, and by the presence of vulnerable local services.
Mitigation Recommendations
If SOCKS proxy functionality is not required, disable the 'protocol = socks' setting in stunnel. If SOCKS proxying is necessary, restrict access to the SOCKS listener by binding it to a trusted management network or localhost only, and enforce client authentication or network ACLs. Running stunnel in a container or network namespace isolated from other local services or applying firewall rules to restrict outgoing connections from stunnel to localhost can further mitigate the risk. There is no explicit vendor patch link provided; check the vendor advisory for updates and fixes. Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance.
stunnel-5.80-1.1 on GA media
Description
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) bypass vulnerability exists in stunnel versions 5.79 and earlier when configured with the non-default 'protocol = socks' setting. This flaw allows an attacker who can reach the SOCKS proxy to bypass localhost restrictions by using IPv4-mapped IPv6 or unspecified addresses, potentially accessing services bound to the local interface that should not be network-accessible. Exploitation depends on the presence and security of such local services. The vulnerability has a medium severity rating.
Affected software
Weaknesses
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-70367 is an SSRF bypass vulnerability in stunnel versions up to 5.79 when configured in SOCKS proxy mode. The issue arises because the SOCKS proxy improperly handles IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (e.g., ::ffff:127.0.0.1) and unspecified addresses (0.0.0.0, ::), allowing clients to circumvent intended localhost access restrictions. This can expose loopback-only services on the stunnel host to network access via the SOCKS proxy. The vulnerability requires the 'protocol = socks' configuration, which is not enabled by default. Exploitation depends on the local services bound to localhost and the network environment. The CVSS v3.1 base score assigned by Red Hat is 5.4 (medium severity) with low attack complexity and low privileges required.
Potential Impact
An attacker able to reach the stunnel SOCKS proxy can bypass localhost restrictions and access services bound to the local interface of the stunnel host that should not be reachable externally. This could lead to unauthorized information disclosure or unauthorized command execution depending on the local services exposed. The overall impact is limited by the requirement that the SOCKS proxy is enabled and accessible, and by the presence of vulnerable local services.
Mitigation Recommendations
If SOCKS proxy functionality is not required, disable the 'protocol = socks' setting in stunnel. If SOCKS proxying is necessary, restrict access to the SOCKS listener by binding it to a trusted management network or localhost only, and enforce client authentication or network ACLs. Running stunnel in a container or network namespace isolated from other local services or applying firewall rules to restrict outgoing connections from stunnel to localhost can further mitigate the risk. There is no explicit vendor patch link provided; check the vendor advisory for updates and fixes. Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance.
Technical Details
- Gcve Source
- db.gcve.eu
- Osv Id
- GHSA-2x69-8qrg-27gr
- Osv Schema Version
- 1.4.0
- Aliases
- ["CVE-2026-70367"]
- Database Specific Severity
- MODERATE
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6a722892bf8831d53935f96f
Added to database: 08/04/2026, 17:59:46 UTC
Last enriched: 09/17/2026, 03:34:14 UTC
Last updated: 09/18/2026, 10:01:33 UTC
Views: 119
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.