Threats Tagged 'cwe-918'
View all threats tagged with 'cwe-918'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'cwe-918'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
CVE-2026-47268: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in nezhahq nezhaCVE-2026-47268 0 Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 0.20.0 to before version 2.0.10, an authenticated Nezha dashboard user can create or update a DDNS profile with provider webhook and configure an arbitrary webhook_url, HTTP method, request body, and headers. When DDNS is triggered for a server that uses that profile, the dashboard process sends the configured request with utils.HttpClient without the SSRF protections used by notification webhooks. This allows a low-privileged authenticated user who controls an owned server/DDNS profile to make the dashboard host issue HTTP requests to loopback or internal network services. The response body is not returned to the attacker in the confirmed path, so this is a blind SSRF / internal state-changing request primitive. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.10. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/12/2026, 20:56:45 UTC Added: 06/12/2026, 21:39:28 UTC |
CVE-2026-46717: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in nezhahq nezhaCVE-2026-46717 0 Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 1.4.0 to before version 2.0.8, nezha's dashboard supports two user roles: RoleAdmin (Role==0) and RoleMember (Role==1). The notification routes POST /api/v1/notification and PATCH /api/v1/notification/:id are wired through commonHandler rather than adminHandler — so a RoleMember user can call them. These handlers synchronously Send() an HTTP request to a user-controlled URL and reflect the entire response body (no size limit) back to the caller on any non-2xx response. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.8. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/12/2026, 21:02:40 UTC Added: 06/12/2026, 21:39:28 UTC |
CVE-2026-53607: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in apostrophecms apostropheCVE-2026-53607 0 ApostropheCMS is an open-source Node.js content management system. In versions up to and including 4.30.0, when `prettyUrls: true` is enabled on `@apostrophecms/file` (a documented SEO feature for serving uploaded files at clean URLs), the public pretty-URL handler builds the upstream URL using the raw `Host` HTTP request header. That URL is then `fetch`'ed and the response body + headers are streamed straight back to the requester. Because `Host` is fully attacker-controlled, an unauthenticated remote attacker can pivot the apostrophe process to issue outbound HTTP requests against any host it can reach on the private network. The path component is constrained to `/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext>` (built from a local-DB lookup), which keeps the impact narrow: cross-instance data exfiltration is neutralized by cuid uniqueness, but blind-SSRF residuals remain (network-topology mapping via response-code / timing differences and verbose proxy/WAF 404 body disclosure). As of time of publication, no known patched versions exist. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/12/2026, 20:54:30 UTC Added: 06/12/2026, 21:09:32 UTC |
CVE-2026-45012: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in apostrophecms apostropheCVE-2026-45012 0 ApostropheCMS is an open-source Node.js content management system. Versions up to and including 4.29.0 contain an authenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the rich-text widget import flow. An authenticated user who can submit/edit rich-text widget content can cause the server to fetch attacker-controlled URLs during widget validation. For image-compatible responses, the fetched content can be persisted and re-hosted by Apostrophe, allowing response exfiltration. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/12/2026, 20:44:48 UTC Added: 06/12/2026, 21:09:29 UTC |
CVE-2026-47170: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in garlic-signage garlic-hubCVE-2026-47170 0 Garlic-Hub manages digital signage network — devices, content, and playlists — from a single self-hosted interface. Prior to version 1.1, authenticated users can cause the server to issue arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services via the uploadFromUrl endpoint. This allows internal port scanning, service fingerprinting, and retrieval of internal HTTP responses which are stored in the publicly accessible media pool. This issue has been patched in version 1.1. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/11/2026, 18:38:46 UTC Added: 06/11/2026, 19:00:24 UTC |
CVE-2026-47157: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in subzeroid aiograpiCVE-2026-47157 0 aiograpi is an asynchronous Instagram API for Python. aiograpi versions before 0.9.10 accepted server-supplied signup challenge paths and used them to build request URLs before validating that the paths were relative Instagram API paths. If an attacker can influence a challenge response, for example through a local network, DNS, or proxy compromise, challenge handling requests could be sent outside the intended Instagram host with the client's existing session headers. Version 0.9.10 validates challenge paths before building URLs, solving captcha challenges, or submitting phone/SMS challenge forms. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/11/2026, 17:18:21 UTC Added: 06/11/2026, 18:00:08 UTC |
CVE-2026-46698: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in stefanbohacek fediverse-embeds-wordpress-pluginCVE-2026-46698 0 Fediverse Embeds embeds fediverse posts on WordPress sites. Prior to version 1.5.9, Fediverse Embeds registered the unauthenticated AJAX action wp_ajax_nopriv_ftf_get_site_info (includes/Site_Info.php) that verified a nonce ftf-fediverse-embeds-nonce and then called file_get_html($site_url) on the attacker-supplied URL. The same nonce was enqueued onto every public page containing a fediverse embed (via includes/Enqueue_Assets.php lines 41-46 + includes/Helpers.php lines 64-83), so the nonce gate was not an authentication boundary; any visitor of a public post with an embed could grab it and reuse it. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.9. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/11/2026, 17:15:52 UTC Added: 06/11/2026, 18:00:08 UTC |
CVE-2026-46697: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in stefanbohacek fediverse-embeds-wordpress-pluginCVE-2026-46697 0 Fediverse Embeds embeds fediverse posts on WordPress sites. Prior to version 1.5.8, Fediverse Embeds registered an unauthenticated REST route ftf/media-proxy (includes/Media_Proxy.php) with permission_callback => __return_true that accepted a base64-encoded URL and forwarded it to wp_remote_get($url) without enforcing any allowlist. The plugin's source contained a comment block explicitly acknowledging that the request should be validated against allowed fediverse domains, but in 1.5.7 the validation only set a local $can_download_media flag that was never read. The full response body was echoed back to the caller, so this was a full-read SSRF / open proxy reachable by any anonymous visitor. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.8. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/11/2026, 17:16:03 UTC Added: 06/11/2026, 18:00:08 UTC |
CVE-2026-3341: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in IBM Langflow DesktopCVE-2026-3341 0 IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.9.2 IBM Langflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/11/2026, 14:47:57 UTC Added: 06/11/2026, 15:30:09 UTC |
CVE-2026-48998: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation in guzzle psr7CVE-2026-48998 0 guzzlehttp/psr7 is a PSR-7 HTTP message library implementation in PHP. Versions prior to 2.10.2 contain improper Host header validation when parsing raw HTTP request messages and when deriving a server request URI from server variables. An attacker can provide a malformed Host header containing URI authority delimiters, such as `trusted.example@evil.example`. When the Host value is used to construct a URI, the malformed value can be reinterpreted as URI userinfo and host. This can cause the PSR-7 request URI host to differ from the original Host header value. Applications are affected if they parse attacker-controlled raw HTTP requests with `GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Message::parseRequest()` or the legacy 1.x `GuzzleHttp\Psr7\parse_request()` function, or if they build server requests from attacker-controlled server variables, then rely on the resulting URI host for routing, allow-list checks, or forwarding decisions. In affected forwarding or gateway scenarios, this may cause requests or credentials to be sent to an unintended host. The issue is patched in `2.10.2`. `1.x` is end-of-life and will not receive a patch. Some workarounds are available. Validate the `Host` header as `uri-host [ ":" port ]` before calling `Message::parseRequest()` or legacy `parse_request()` on untrusted HTTP request data, or before deriving routing and forwarding decisions from a parsed request URI. Reject Host values containing userinfo, path, query, or fragment delimiters. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/11/2026, 12:34:32 UTC Added: 06/11/2026, 12:52:42 UTC |
Showing 1 to 10 of 658 results