Build script exposes PyPI to domain takeover attacks
A vulnerability (CVE-2023-45311) has been discovered in legacy Python packages that use bootstrap scripts fetching installation code from the domain python-distribute. org, which is now unowned and available for takeover. This flaw affects packages such as tornado, pypiserver, and slapos. core, enabling attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code by hijacking the domain. The root cause is the outdated reliance on the 'distribute' module and hard-coded domains in build tools, exposing the Python Package Index (PyPI) supply chain to domain takeover risks. Although no active exploitation is reported, this vulnerability poses a medium severity threat due to its supply chain implications and potential for widespread impact. European organizations using affected Python packages in development or production environments could face risks of code injection, leading to compromised systems or data breaches. Mitigation requires auditing dependencies for legacy bootstrap scripts, removing or updating usage of 'distribute', and avoiding reliance on hard-coded external domains. Countries with strong Python developer communities and critical infrastructure relying on open-source Python packages, such as Germany, France, and the UK, are most likely to be affected. The vulnerability does not require authentication but depends on executing legacy build scripts, making exploitation moderately easy in vulnerable environments.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
ReversingLabs researchers identified a supply chain vulnerability in legacy Python packages related to the 'distribute' module, which historically served as a packaging tool before being deprecated. The vulnerability (CVE-2023-45311) arises from bootstrap scripts embedded in affected packages that, during installation, fetch and execute an installation script from the domain python-distribute.org. This domain is no longer owned by the original maintainers and is currently available for sale, creating a domain takeover risk. If an attacker acquires this domain, they can serve malicious installation scripts to any environment running these bootstrap scripts, leading to arbitrary code execution. Affected packages include widely used Python projects such as tornado, pypiserver, and slapos.core, among others. The issue stems from the complex evolution of Python packaging tools and the failure to formally decommission the 'distribute' module, resulting in legacy code that still relies on hard-coded external domains. This scenario exemplifies the dangers of code rot and the importance of maintaining supply chain integrity in open-source ecosystems. Although no exploits have been observed in the wild, the potential impact is significant due to the trust placed in PyPI packages and the ease with which compromised installation scripts could propagate malicious code. The vulnerability is categorized as medium severity, reflecting the moderate ease of exploitation combined with the potentially broad impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant supply chain risk. Organizations relying on Python packages such as tornado, pypiserver, and slapos.core—common in web services, internal tooling, and cloud infrastructure—may inadvertently execute malicious code if their build environments use legacy bootstrap scripts referencing python-distribute.org. This could lead to unauthorized code execution, data breaches, service disruptions, or further lateral movement within networks. The impact is amplified in sectors with critical infrastructure or sensitive data, including finance, healthcare, and government services. Since PyPI is a global repository, the risk is not geographically constrained but depends on the adoption of affected packages and legacy build processes. European entities with extensive Python development or deployment pipelines are at risk, especially if they have not audited or updated legacy dependencies. The medium severity rating reflects that while exploitation requires running vulnerable bootstrap scripts, no authentication or user interaction is needed, making automated attacks feasible in some environments. The potential for widespread compromise through supply chain poisoning underscores the need for proactive mitigation.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Audit all Python projects and dependencies for usage of legacy bootstrap scripts that reference python-distribute.org or the 'distribute' module. 2. Remove or replace any usage of the 'distribute' module with modern, actively maintained packaging tools such as setuptools or pip. 3. Avoid hard-coded external domains in build or installation scripts; use verified package repositories and secure URLs. 4. Implement strict supply chain security practices, including verifying package integrity via checksums and signatures. 5. Monitor for any acquisition or changes in ownership of python-distribute.org and related domains to detect potential malicious activity. 6. Update CI/CD pipelines and build environments to disallow execution of legacy bootstrap scripts or untrusted external code during package installation. 7. Engage with open-source communities to encourage deprecation and removal of legacy code that relies on vulnerable domains. 8. Educate developers and DevOps teams about supply chain risks and the importance of dependency hygiene. 9. Employ runtime detection tools to identify unexpected network calls or script executions during package installation. 10. Consider network-level controls to block access to suspicious or unowned domains referenced in build scripts.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden
Indicators of Compromise
- cve: CVE-2023-45311
- hash: 357f2fe2684c54339fb78ff447d8cbc127071633
- hash: 8285c1c8188f198e9440c97e8aed933704b32d82
- hash: 9f02932adcbafc7f4c681df66b597df10f34b134
- hash: b6664ae860ca4793e368abb0c569ddefcbc7ac96
- hash: cc298ff510dee97bf5f8abac68bafc22bcfadc11
- hash: e68c89e553a2e70380492bdb8cfb74c224456766
Build script exposes PyPI to domain takeover attacks
Description
A vulnerability (CVE-2023-45311) has been discovered in legacy Python packages that use bootstrap scripts fetching installation code from the domain python-distribute. org, which is now unowned and available for takeover. This flaw affects packages such as tornado, pypiserver, and slapos. core, enabling attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code by hijacking the domain. The root cause is the outdated reliance on the 'distribute' module and hard-coded domains in build tools, exposing the Python Package Index (PyPI) supply chain to domain takeover risks. Although no active exploitation is reported, this vulnerability poses a medium severity threat due to its supply chain implications and potential for widespread impact. European organizations using affected Python packages in development or production environments could face risks of code injection, leading to compromised systems or data breaches. Mitigation requires auditing dependencies for legacy bootstrap scripts, removing or updating usage of 'distribute', and avoiding reliance on hard-coded external domains. Countries with strong Python developer communities and critical infrastructure relying on open-source Python packages, such as Germany, France, and the UK, are most likely to be affected. The vulnerability does not require authentication but depends on executing legacy build scripts, making exploitation moderately easy in vulnerable environments.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
ReversingLabs researchers identified a supply chain vulnerability in legacy Python packages related to the 'distribute' module, which historically served as a packaging tool before being deprecated. The vulnerability (CVE-2023-45311) arises from bootstrap scripts embedded in affected packages that, during installation, fetch and execute an installation script from the domain python-distribute.org. This domain is no longer owned by the original maintainers and is currently available for sale, creating a domain takeover risk. If an attacker acquires this domain, they can serve malicious installation scripts to any environment running these bootstrap scripts, leading to arbitrary code execution. Affected packages include widely used Python projects such as tornado, pypiserver, and slapos.core, among others. The issue stems from the complex evolution of Python packaging tools and the failure to formally decommission the 'distribute' module, resulting in legacy code that still relies on hard-coded external domains. This scenario exemplifies the dangers of code rot and the importance of maintaining supply chain integrity in open-source ecosystems. Although no exploits have been observed in the wild, the potential impact is significant due to the trust placed in PyPI packages and the ease with which compromised installation scripts could propagate malicious code. The vulnerability is categorized as medium severity, reflecting the moderate ease of exploitation combined with the potentially broad impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant supply chain risk. Organizations relying on Python packages such as tornado, pypiserver, and slapos.core—common in web services, internal tooling, and cloud infrastructure—may inadvertently execute malicious code if their build environments use legacy bootstrap scripts referencing python-distribute.org. This could lead to unauthorized code execution, data breaches, service disruptions, or further lateral movement within networks. The impact is amplified in sectors with critical infrastructure or sensitive data, including finance, healthcare, and government services. Since PyPI is a global repository, the risk is not geographically constrained but depends on the adoption of affected packages and legacy build processes. European entities with extensive Python development or deployment pipelines are at risk, especially if they have not audited or updated legacy dependencies. The medium severity rating reflects that while exploitation requires running vulnerable bootstrap scripts, no authentication or user interaction is needed, making automated attacks feasible in some environments. The potential for widespread compromise through supply chain poisoning underscores the need for proactive mitigation.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Audit all Python projects and dependencies for usage of legacy bootstrap scripts that reference python-distribute.org or the 'distribute' module. 2. Remove or replace any usage of the 'distribute' module with modern, actively maintained packaging tools such as setuptools or pip. 3. Avoid hard-coded external domains in build or installation scripts; use verified package repositories and secure URLs. 4. Implement strict supply chain security practices, including verifying package integrity via checksums and signatures. 5. Monitor for any acquisition or changes in ownership of python-distribute.org and related domains to detect potential malicious activity. 6. Update CI/CD pipelines and build environments to disallow execution of legacy bootstrap scripts or untrusted external code during package installation. 7. Engage with open-source communities to encourage deprecation and removal of legacy code that relies on vulnerable domains. 8. Educate developers and DevOps teams about supply chain risks and the importance of dependency hygiene. 9. Employ runtime detection tools to identify unexpected network calls or script executions during package installation. 10. Consider network-level controls to block access to suspicious or unowned domains referenced in build scripts.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Author
- AlienVault
- Tlp
- white
- References
- ["https://www.reversinglabs.com/blog/build-script-exposes-pypi-to-domain-takeover-attacks"]
- Adversary
- null
- Pulse Id
- 6924c9abb614eb03b6f6433d
- Threat Score
- null
Indicators of Compromise
Cve
| Value | Description | Copy |
|---|---|---|
cveCVE-2023-45311 | — |
Hash
| Value | Description | Copy |
|---|---|---|
hash357f2fe2684c54339fb78ff447d8cbc127071633 | — | |
hash8285c1c8188f198e9440c97e8aed933704b32d82 | — | |
hash9f02932adcbafc7f4c681df66b597df10f34b134 | — | |
hashb6664ae860ca4793e368abb0c569ddefcbc7ac96 | — | |
hashcc298ff510dee97bf5f8abac68bafc22bcfadc11 | — | |
hashe68c89e553a2e70380492bdb8cfb74c224456766 | — |
Threat ID: 69256fb97e8c0fda07b5dbc1
Added to database: 11/25/2025, 8:58:33 AM
Last enriched: 11/25/2025, 8:58:56 AM
Last updated: 12/4/2025, 11:24:34 AM
Views: 285
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
4.3 Million Browsers Infected: Inside ShadyPanda's 7-Year Malware Campaign
MediumMalicious VSCode Extension Launches Multi-Stage Attack Chain with Anivia Loader and OctoRAT
MediumDNS Uncovers Infrastructure Used in SSO Attacks
MediumUnraveling Water Saci's New Multi-Format, AI-Enhanced Attacks Propagated via WhatsApp
MediumOperation DupeHike: Targeting Russian employees with DUPERUNNER and AdaptixC2
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.