CVE-2024-25714: n/a
In Rhonabwy through 1.1.13, HMAC signature verification uses a strcmp function that is vulnerable to side-channel attacks, because it stops the comparison when the first difference is spotted in the two signatures. (The fix uses gnutls_memcmp, which has constant-time execution.)
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-25714 identifies a critical cryptographic vulnerability in the Rhonabwy software up to version 1.1.13. The core issue lies in the use of the standard strcmp function for HMAC signature verification. strcmp performs a byte-by-byte comparison and returns immediately upon detecting the first difference between two strings. This behavior introduces a timing side-channel vulnerability because the time taken to compare two signatures varies depending on how many initial bytes match. An attacker can exploit this timing discrepancy to gradually infer the correct HMAC signature by measuring response times, effectively enabling key recovery or signature forgery. The vulnerability compromises both confidentiality and integrity of the cryptographic process. The fix involves replacing strcmp with gnutls_memcmp, a function designed to execute in constant time regardless of input, thereby eliminating timing leaks. The CVSS v3.1 score of 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) indicates that the vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication or user interaction and results in high confidentiality and integrity impact, but no availability impact. No known exploits have been observed in the wild yet, but the vulnerability is severe due to the fundamental cryptographic weakness it exposes. The CWE-1255 classification relates to side-channel timing attacks on cryptographic operations. Organizations using Rhonabwy for secure communications or cryptographic validation should prioritize patching or applying mitigations to prevent exploitation.
Potential Impact
The vulnerability allows remote attackers to perform timing side-channel attacks against HMAC signature verification, potentially recovering secret keys or forging valid signatures. This undermines the confidentiality and integrity of communications or data protected by Rhonabwy's HMAC implementation. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized data access, message tampering, or bypassing authentication mechanisms relying on HMAC. Since no authentication or user interaction is required, the attack surface is broad, increasing risk for exposed services using vulnerable versions. Although availability is not impacted, the breach of confidentiality and integrity can have severe consequences, including data leaks, fraud, and loss of trust. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure that rely on Rhonabwy or its cryptographic components are particularly at risk. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests a window of opportunity for proactive mitigation before active attacks emerge.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately upgrade Rhonabwy to a version that replaces strcmp with a constant-time comparison function such as gnutls_memcmp once a patch is released. 2. If a patch is not yet available, consider applying temporary mitigations such as adding artificial delays to signature verification to obscure timing differences, though this is less secure. 3. Conduct code audits of any custom cryptographic verification routines to ensure constant-time operations are used for all sensitive comparisons. 4. Monitor network traffic and logs for anomalous timing-based probing attempts targeting HMAC verification endpoints. 5. Employ network-level protections such as rate limiting and anomaly detection to reduce the feasibility of timing attacks. 6. Educate developers and security teams about side-channel risks and enforce cryptographic best practices in development. 7. Review and strengthen overall cryptographic key management to limit exposure if keys are compromised. 8. Consider deploying application-layer mitigations like HMAC key rotation and multi-factor authentication to reduce impact of potential signature forgery.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Japan, South Korea, Canada, Australia, Netherlands, Sweden
CVE-2024-25714: n/a
Description
In Rhonabwy through 1.1.13, HMAC signature verification uses a strcmp function that is vulnerable to side-channel attacks, because it stops the comparison when the first difference is spotted in the two signatures. (The fix uses gnutls_memcmp, which has constant-time execution.)
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-25714 identifies a critical cryptographic vulnerability in the Rhonabwy software up to version 1.1.13. The core issue lies in the use of the standard strcmp function for HMAC signature verification. strcmp performs a byte-by-byte comparison and returns immediately upon detecting the first difference between two strings. This behavior introduces a timing side-channel vulnerability because the time taken to compare two signatures varies depending on how many initial bytes match. An attacker can exploit this timing discrepancy to gradually infer the correct HMAC signature by measuring response times, effectively enabling key recovery or signature forgery. The vulnerability compromises both confidentiality and integrity of the cryptographic process. The fix involves replacing strcmp with gnutls_memcmp, a function designed to execute in constant time regardless of input, thereby eliminating timing leaks. The CVSS v3.1 score of 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) indicates that the vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication or user interaction and results in high confidentiality and integrity impact, but no availability impact. No known exploits have been observed in the wild yet, but the vulnerability is severe due to the fundamental cryptographic weakness it exposes. The CWE-1255 classification relates to side-channel timing attacks on cryptographic operations. Organizations using Rhonabwy for secure communications or cryptographic validation should prioritize patching or applying mitigations to prevent exploitation.
Potential Impact
The vulnerability allows remote attackers to perform timing side-channel attacks against HMAC signature verification, potentially recovering secret keys or forging valid signatures. This undermines the confidentiality and integrity of communications or data protected by Rhonabwy's HMAC implementation. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized data access, message tampering, or bypassing authentication mechanisms relying on HMAC. Since no authentication or user interaction is required, the attack surface is broad, increasing risk for exposed services using vulnerable versions. Although availability is not impacted, the breach of confidentiality and integrity can have severe consequences, including data leaks, fraud, and loss of trust. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure that rely on Rhonabwy or its cryptographic components are particularly at risk. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests a window of opportunity for proactive mitigation before active attacks emerge.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately upgrade Rhonabwy to a version that replaces strcmp with a constant-time comparison function such as gnutls_memcmp once a patch is released. 2. If a patch is not yet available, consider applying temporary mitigations such as adding artificial delays to signature verification to obscure timing differences, though this is less secure. 3. Conduct code audits of any custom cryptographic verification routines to ensure constant-time operations are used for all sensitive comparisons. 4. Monitor network traffic and logs for anomalous timing-based probing attempts targeting HMAC verification endpoints. 5. Employ network-level protections such as rate limiting and anomaly detection to reduce the feasibility of timing attacks. 6. Educate developers and security teams about side-channel risks and enforce cryptographic best practices in development. 7. Review and strengthen overall cryptographic key management to limit exposure if keys are compromised. 8. Consider deploying application-layer mitigations like HMAC key rotation and multi-factor authentication to reduce impact of potential signature forgery.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2024-02-11T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 699f6d6db7ef31ef0b572103
Added to database: 2/25/2026, 9:45:17 PM
Last enriched: 2/26/2026, 10:43:51 AM
Last updated: 4/12/2026, 3:44:16 PM
Views: 11
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.