Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2024-30213: StoneFly Storage Concentrator · Command Injection

Source CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.8 High · fixed in 8.0.4.26 : patch affected systems soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
8.8High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
1.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 70% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 8.0.4.26
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 12 Jul 2024

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

AI-suggested

2) Restrict access to the management interfaces of StoneFly Storage Concentrators to trusted administrators only, using network segmentation, VPNs, or zero-trust access models. 3) Enforce the principle of least privilege by limiting authenticated user permissions to only those necessary for their roles, reducing the risk of command injection exploitation. 4) Implement strict input validation and sanitization controls on any user-supplied data if custom integrations or scripts interact with the Ping URL functionality. 5) Enable detailed logging and continuous monitoring of administrative actions and network traffic related to the storage concentrator to detect anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. 6) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on storage infrastructure to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities proactively. 7) Prepare incident response plans specific to storage system compromises to minimize downtime and data loss in case of exploitation.

Description

StoneFly Storage Concentrator (SC and SCVM) before 8.0.4.26 allows remote authenticated users to achieve Command Injection via a Ping URL, leading to remote code execution.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…