VulnerabilityPublished 22 Apr 2024Updated 22 Nov 2024

CVE-2024-32394: An issue in ruijie.com/cn RG-RSR10-01G-T(WA)-S RSR_3.0(1)B9P2_RSR10-01G-TW-S_07150910 and

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · 12% EPSS · CVSS 8.8 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.8High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 12.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 96% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 22 Apr 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Immediately restrict external network access to the management interfaces of affected Ruijie devices, ideally limiting access to trusted internal networks or VPNs.
Implement strict firewall rules to block unauthorized HTTP requests targeting these devices.
Monitor network traffic for unusual or malformed HTTP requests that could indicate exploitation attempts.
Conduct vulnerability scans specifically targeting Ruijie RG-RSR10-01G-T(WA)-S devices to identify affected systems.
Engage with Ruijie support channels to obtain and apply firmware updates or patches as soon as they become available.
If patches are not yet available, consider temporary mitigations such as disabling HTTP management interfaces or using alternative secure management protocols.
Employ network segmentation to isolate critical infrastructure devices from general user networks.
Maintain up-to-date backups and incident response plans to quickly recover from potential compromises.
Educate network administrators about this vulnerability and the importance of monitoring and restricting access to network device management interfaces.

Description

An issue in ruijie.com/cn RG-RSR10-01G-T(WA)-S RSR_3.0(1)B9P2_RSR10-01G-TW-S_07150910 and RG-RSR10-01G-T(WA)-S RSR_3.0(1)B9P2_RSR10-01G-TW-S_07150910 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP request.

Impact

The impact of CVE-2024-32394 is substantial for organizations using affected Ruijie network devices. Successful exploitation allows attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely without authentication, potentially leading to full device compromise. This can result in unauthorized access to sensitive network traffic, disruption of network services, and the ability to pivot to other internal systems. The compromise of core network infrastructure devices can severely affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of organizational data and services. Enterprises relying on these devices for critical connectivity or security functions face risks of data breaches, service outages, and reputational damage. Additionally, attackers could implant persistent backdoors or manipulate network traffic for espionage or sabotage. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently provides a window for proactive defense, but the high severity score underscores the urgency of addressing this vulnerability.

References

gist.github.com/Swind1er/7aad5c28e5bdc91d73fa7489b7250c94 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…