Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2024-46507: yeti-platform · SSTI

Affects yeti-platformSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · public detection template (Nuclei) · CVSS 7.3 High : upgrade to 2.1.12 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.3High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
3.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 90% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 2.1.12
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 8 May 2026

  2. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  3. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  4. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade yeti-platform to 2.1.12.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
GitHubyeti-platformpkg:github/yeti-platformOther threatsAffected
  • <2.1.12
Fixed in
  • 2.1.12

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, restricting access to the vulnerable functionality and applying application-level input validation may reduce exposure.

Description

CVE-2024-46507 is a server-side template injection (SSTI) vulnerability in the custom template export function of yeti-platform versions before 2.1.12. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the application server. It has a high severity with a CVSS score of 7.3, indicating significant risk if exploited. There are no known exploits in the wild at this time.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…