VulnerabilityPublished 7 Nov 2024Updated 4 Nov 2025

CVE-2024-50141: Linux kernel · ACPI: PRM: Find EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME block for PRM handler and context

Source GCVE Database

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium.

Data as of 29 Oct 2026, 23:29 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Nov 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

ghsa-h3fv-6wg7-93g2

What to do

AI-suggested

A fix has been implemented in the Linux kernel to ensure the PRMT locates and uses EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME memory blocks for the PRM handler and context. Systems should apply the official Linux kernel update that includes this fix. No additional mitigation actions are specified or required beyond applying the patch.

Description

CVE-2024-50141 is a medium severity vulnerability in the Linux kernel's ACPI PRM handler related to incorrect memory type usage for EFI runtime services. The PRMT component was incorrectly locating EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY blocks instead of EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME blocks for the PRM handler and context. This mismatch causes exceptions during runtime service calls, leading to paging request errors and potential failures in error handling. The issue is resolved by ensuring the PRMT finds and uses memory blocks with the EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute, which are properly remapped for runtime by the firmware.

Impact

The vulnerability can cause runtime exceptions and failures in the PRM handler due to incorrect memory mapping, leading to potential system instability or crashes during EFI runtime service calls. There is no indication of confidentiality or integrity impact. The CVSS score of 5.5 reflects a medium severity with local attack vector, low complexity, and no user interaction required. No known exploits in the wild have been reported.

Summary

This vulnerability in the Linux kernel involves the ACPI PRM handler's failure to locate the correct EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME memory blocks required for proper physical-to-virtual address translation during EFI runtime services. Instead, it was finding EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY blocks, which are inappropriate for runtime services as per the UEFI specification. This causes exceptions such as paging request errors when the PRM handler is invoked. The fix ensures that only memory regions marked with EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME are used, preventing these runtime exceptions and ensuring stable operation of the PRM handler.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…