CVE-2024-7143: Insecure Inherited Permissions
A flaw was found in the Pulp package. When a role-based access control (RBAC) object in Pulp is set to assign permissions on its creation, it uses the `AutoAddObjPermsMixin` (typically the add_roles_for_object_creator method). This method finds the object creator by checking the current authenticated user. For objects that are created within a task, this current user is set by the first user with any permissions on the task object. This means the oldest user with model/domain-level task permissions will always be set as the current user of a task, even if they didn't dispatch the task. Therefore, all objects created in tasks will have their permissions assigned to this oldest user, and the creating user will receive nothing.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The vulnerability CVE-2024-7143 affects the Pulp package's role-based access control (RBAC) mechanism, specifically how permissions are assigned to objects created within tasks. Pulp uses the AutoAddObjPermsMixin, typically the add_roles_for_object_creator method, to assign permissions to the creator of an object. However, when objects are created inside tasks, the 'current authenticated user' is determined not by the actual task dispatcher but by the oldest user with any model or domain-level permissions on the task object. This results in all objects created during tasks inheriting permissions assigned to this oldest user rather than the actual creator. Consequently, the legitimate creator receives no permissions, while an unrelated user gains access rights. This flaw compromises confidentiality and integrity by misallocating permissions, potentially allowing unauthorized access or modification of sensitive objects. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.0 score of 6.7, indicating medium severity, with an attack vector over the network, low attack complexity, requiring privileges but no user interaction, and impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability to varying degrees. No public exploits are currently known, but the issue poses a risk in environments where Pulp is used for content management, automation, or package distribution, especially in multi-user or multi-tenant setups.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-7143 can be significant, particularly in sectors relying on Pulp for managing software repositories, content distribution, or automation workflows. Misassigned permissions can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data or administrative functions, violating data protection regulations such as GDPR. This could result in data breaches, compliance penalties, and reputational damage. The integrity of managed content could be compromised if unauthorized users can modify or delete objects. Availability impact is lower but possible if permission mismanagement leads to denial of service or disruption of automated tasks. Organizations in critical infrastructure, government, finance, and large enterprises using Pulp must be vigilant, as attackers with some privileges could exploit this flaw to escalate access or exfiltrate data. The medium severity rating suggests a moderate but non-trivial risk that requires timely remediation to prevent exploitation in complex environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-7143, organizations should: 1) Monitor Pulp vendor announcements and apply patches or updates as soon as they become available to fix the permission assignment logic. 2) Conduct thorough audits of RBAC configurations and task-related permission assignments to identify and correct any misassigned permissions. 3) Implement strict access controls limiting who can assign or hold task-level permissions, reducing the risk of the oldest user being an unintended permission recipient. 4) Use logging and monitoring to detect unusual permission changes or access patterns related to task-created objects. 5) Where possible, isolate task execution contexts or use service accounts with minimal privileges to reduce the impact of permission inheritance flaws. 6) Educate administrators and developers about this vulnerability to avoid workarounds that could exacerbate the issue. 7) Consider compensating controls such as multi-factor authentication and network segmentation to limit exploitation opportunities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2024-7143: Insecure Inherited Permissions
Description
A flaw was found in the Pulp package. When a role-based access control (RBAC) object in Pulp is set to assign permissions on its creation, it uses the `AutoAddObjPermsMixin` (typically the add_roles_for_object_creator method). This method finds the object creator by checking the current authenticated user. For objects that are created within a task, this current user is set by the first user with any permissions on the task object. This means the oldest user with model/domain-level task permissions will always be set as the current user of a task, even if they didn't dispatch the task. Therefore, all objects created in tasks will have their permissions assigned to this oldest user, and the creating user will receive nothing.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability CVE-2024-7143 affects the Pulp package's role-based access control (RBAC) mechanism, specifically how permissions are assigned to objects created within tasks. Pulp uses the AutoAddObjPermsMixin, typically the add_roles_for_object_creator method, to assign permissions to the creator of an object. However, when objects are created inside tasks, the 'current authenticated user' is determined not by the actual task dispatcher but by the oldest user with any model or domain-level permissions on the task object. This results in all objects created during tasks inheriting permissions assigned to this oldest user rather than the actual creator. Consequently, the legitimate creator receives no permissions, while an unrelated user gains access rights. This flaw compromises confidentiality and integrity by misallocating permissions, potentially allowing unauthorized access or modification of sensitive objects. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.0 score of 6.7, indicating medium severity, with an attack vector over the network, low attack complexity, requiring privileges but no user interaction, and impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability to varying degrees. No public exploits are currently known, but the issue poses a risk in environments where Pulp is used for content management, automation, or package distribution, especially in multi-user or multi-tenant setups.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-7143 can be significant, particularly in sectors relying on Pulp for managing software repositories, content distribution, or automation workflows. Misassigned permissions can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data or administrative functions, violating data protection regulations such as GDPR. This could result in data breaches, compliance penalties, and reputational damage. The integrity of managed content could be compromised if unauthorized users can modify or delete objects. Availability impact is lower but possible if permission mismanagement leads to denial of service or disruption of automated tasks. Organizations in critical infrastructure, government, finance, and large enterprises using Pulp must be vigilant, as attackers with some privileges could exploit this flaw to escalate access or exfiltrate data. The medium severity rating suggests a moderate but non-trivial risk that requires timely remediation to prevent exploitation in complex environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-7143, organizations should: 1) Monitor Pulp vendor announcements and apply patches or updates as soon as they become available to fix the permission assignment logic. 2) Conduct thorough audits of RBAC configurations and task-related permission assignments to identify and correct any misassigned permissions. 3) Implement strict access controls limiting who can assign or hold task-level permissions, reducing the risk of the oldest user being an unintended permission recipient. 4) Use logging and monitoring to detect unusual permission changes or access patterns related to task-created objects. 5) Where possible, isolate task execution contexts or use service accounts with minimal privileges to reduce the impact of permission inheritance flaws. 6) Educate administrators and developers about this vulnerability to avoid workarounds that could exacerbate the issue. 7) Consider compensating controls such as multi-factor authentication and network segmentation to limit exploitation opportunities.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-07-26T18:48:08.747Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 691f82024f1c50aa2eb5ae92
Added to database: 11/20/2025, 9:02:58 PM
Last enriched: 1/30/2026, 9:49:59 AM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 6:53:19 AM
Views: 56
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2076: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2025-15491: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Post Slides
HighCVE-2025-15267: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumCVE-2025-13463: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumCVE-2025-12803: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.