CVE-2025-11489: Symlink Following in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP
CVE-2025-11489 is a low-severity vulnerability in wonderwhy-er's DesktopCommanderMCP (up to version 0. 2. 13) involving symlink following due to insufficient path restriction in the isPathAllowed function. The vulnerability can only be exploited locally with high attack complexity and requires low privileges but no user interaction. The affected product is no longer supported, and the vendor recommends using Docker for better isolation. Exploits are publicly disclosed but not known to be used in the wild. The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is limited, and the vulnerability does not pose a significant threat to most environments. European organizations using this unsupported software should consider migrating or isolating affected instances. Countries with higher adoption of this niche tool or with more advanced local development environments may be more exposed. Overall, the risk is low but should be managed through isolation and migration strategies.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-11489 is a security vulnerability identified in the DesktopCommanderMCP software developed by wonderwhy-er, affecting all versions up to 0.2.13. The flaw resides in the isPathAllowed function within the src/tools/filesystem.ts file, where improper handling of symbolic links (symlinks) allows an attacker to bypass intended path restrictions by following symlinks. This can potentially lead to unauthorized access or manipulation of files outside the intended directory scope. However, exploitation requires local access to the environment where DesktopCommanderMCP is installed, and the attack complexity is high, meaning it is difficult to execute successfully. The vulnerability requires low privileges but no user interaction, and the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is limited (CVSS 2.0). The vendor has clarified that the restriction features are designed as guardrails for large language models (LLMs) rather than hardened security boundaries, and recommends running DesktopCommanderMCP within Docker containers to achieve stronger isolation. The product is no longer maintained or supported, and no patches are available. Public disclosure of the exploit exists, but no known active exploitation has been reported. This vulnerability mainly affects local users or attackers with some level of access to the host system, limiting its threat scope.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the direct impact of CVE-2025-11489 is limited due to the requirement for local access and the high complexity of exploitation. The vulnerability could allow an attacker with local access to bypass path restrictions and potentially access or modify files outside the intended directories, which may lead to minor confidentiality or integrity breaches. However, since the affected software is niche, no longer supported, and typically used in development or specialized environments, widespread operational disruption or data loss is unlikely. Organizations relying on DesktopCommanderMCP without container isolation might face increased risk, especially if local user accounts are shared or compromised. The low CVSS score reflects the limited scope and difficulty of exploitation. Nonetheless, any unauthorized local access in sensitive environments can be a foothold for further attacks, so mitigating this vulnerability remains important. European entities with development teams or research groups using this tool should assess their exposure and consider migration or isolation strategies to reduce risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the lack of vendor support and patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Migrate away from DesktopCommanderMCP versions up to 0.2.13 to supported or alternative tools that provide hardened security boundaries. 2) If continued use is necessary, run DesktopCommanderMCP within Docker containers or other sandboxing technologies to enforce strong isolation and prevent local privilege escalation or unauthorized file access. 3) Restrict local access to systems running DesktopCommanderMCP by enforcing strict user account controls, minimizing the number of users with local access, and employing endpoint security solutions to detect suspicious activities. 4) Monitor local system logs and file system changes for signs of symlink exploitation attempts. 5) Educate local users about the risks of symlink attacks and the importance of maintaining secure local environments. 6) Implement file system permissions and access control lists (ACLs) to limit the impact of any symlink traversal. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on isolation, access control, and migration given the unsupported status of the product.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden
CVE-2025-11489: Symlink Following in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP
Description
CVE-2025-11489 is a low-severity vulnerability in wonderwhy-er's DesktopCommanderMCP (up to version 0. 2. 13) involving symlink following due to insufficient path restriction in the isPathAllowed function. The vulnerability can only be exploited locally with high attack complexity and requires low privileges but no user interaction. The affected product is no longer supported, and the vendor recommends using Docker for better isolation. Exploits are publicly disclosed but not known to be used in the wild. The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is limited, and the vulnerability does not pose a significant threat to most environments. European organizations using this unsupported software should consider migrating or isolating affected instances. Countries with higher adoption of this niche tool or with more advanced local development environments may be more exposed. Overall, the risk is low but should be managed through isolation and migration strategies.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-11489 is a security vulnerability identified in the DesktopCommanderMCP software developed by wonderwhy-er, affecting all versions up to 0.2.13. The flaw resides in the isPathAllowed function within the src/tools/filesystem.ts file, where improper handling of symbolic links (symlinks) allows an attacker to bypass intended path restrictions by following symlinks. This can potentially lead to unauthorized access or manipulation of files outside the intended directory scope. However, exploitation requires local access to the environment where DesktopCommanderMCP is installed, and the attack complexity is high, meaning it is difficult to execute successfully. The vulnerability requires low privileges but no user interaction, and the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is limited (CVSS 2.0). The vendor has clarified that the restriction features are designed as guardrails for large language models (LLMs) rather than hardened security boundaries, and recommends running DesktopCommanderMCP within Docker containers to achieve stronger isolation. The product is no longer maintained or supported, and no patches are available. Public disclosure of the exploit exists, but no known active exploitation has been reported. This vulnerability mainly affects local users or attackers with some level of access to the host system, limiting its threat scope.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the direct impact of CVE-2025-11489 is limited due to the requirement for local access and the high complexity of exploitation. The vulnerability could allow an attacker with local access to bypass path restrictions and potentially access or modify files outside the intended directories, which may lead to minor confidentiality or integrity breaches. However, since the affected software is niche, no longer supported, and typically used in development or specialized environments, widespread operational disruption or data loss is unlikely. Organizations relying on DesktopCommanderMCP without container isolation might face increased risk, especially if local user accounts are shared or compromised. The low CVSS score reflects the limited scope and difficulty of exploitation. Nonetheless, any unauthorized local access in sensitive environments can be a foothold for further attacks, so mitigating this vulnerability remains important. European entities with development teams or research groups using this tool should assess their exposure and consider migration or isolation strategies to reduce risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the lack of vendor support and patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Migrate away from DesktopCommanderMCP versions up to 0.2.13 to supported or alternative tools that provide hardened security boundaries. 2) If continued use is necessary, run DesktopCommanderMCP within Docker containers or other sandboxing technologies to enforce strong isolation and prevent local privilege escalation or unauthorized file access. 3) Restrict local access to systems running DesktopCommanderMCP by enforcing strict user account controls, minimizing the number of users with local access, and employing endpoint security solutions to detect suspicious activities. 4) Monitor local system logs and file system changes for signs of symlink exploitation attempts. 5) Educate local users about the risks of symlink attacks and the importance of maintaining secure local environments. 6) Implement file system permissions and access control lists (ACLs) to limit the impact of any symlink traversal. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on isolation, access control, and migration given the unsupported status of the product.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- VulDB
- Date Reserved
- 2025-10-08T10:41:17.305Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68e6ab3a69f5e3b7242495f6
Added to database: 10/8/2025, 6:19:38 PM
Last enriched: 10/30/2025, 4:43:46 AM
Last updated: 11/20/2025, 8:12:29 PM
Views: 46
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2023-4001: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
MediumCVE-2023-3961: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CriticalCVE-2024-6535: Use of Default Credentials
MediumCVE-2024-6237: Improper Handling of Missing Values
MediumCVE-2023-39329: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.