CVE-2025-11687VulnerabilityPublished 26 Jan 2026

CVE-2025-11687: gi-docgen · Cross-site Scripting

Affects gi-docgenSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.1 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 31% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubgnome/gi-docgen`pkg:github/gnome/gi-docgen`Other threats	Affected =0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-11687, organizations should implement strict input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data, especially parameters like q that are reflected in web pages. Employing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can help restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts. Developers should update gi-docgen to patched versions once available and review custom integrations for similar input handling flaws. Security teams should educate users about the risks of clicking on suspicious URLs and implement email filtering to reduce phishing attempts. Monitoring web traffic and logs for unusual query parameters or repeated attempts to exploit XSS can aid early detection. For environments hosting gi-docgen-generated documentation, consider isolating these services and enforcing strict access controls. Additionally, adopting automated security testing tools that detect DOM-based XSS during development and deployment can prevent future vulnerabilities.

Description

A flaw was found in the gi-docgen. This vulnerability allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the page — enabling DOM access, session cookie theft and other client-side attacks — via a crafted URL that supplies a malicious value to the q GET parameter (reflected DOM XSS).

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2025-11687 is on the confidentiality and integrity of user sessions and data within environments using gi-docgen. Successful exploitation can lead to theft of session cookies, enabling attackers to hijack user sessions and impersonate legitimate users. This can result in unauthorized access to sensitive documentation or internal resources. DOM manipulation can also lead to misleading or malicious content being displayed, potentially facilitating phishing or further malware delivery. While availability is not directly impacted, the breach of confidentiality and integrity can have cascading effects on organizational security posture. Organizations relying on gi-docgen for internal or public documentation may face reputational damage, data leakage, and increased risk of targeted attacks. Since exploitation requires user interaction, social engineering or phishing campaigns could be used to lure victims to malicious URLs. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as public disclosure may prompt attackers to develop exploits.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…