CVE-2025-14505: CWE-1240: Use of a Cryptographic Primitive with a Risky Implementation in Elliptic
The ECDSA implementation of the Elliptic package generates incorrect signatures if an interim value of 'k' (as computed based on step 3.2 of RFC 6979 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6979 ) has leading zeros and is susceptible to cryptanalysis, which can lead to secret key exposure. This happens, because the byte-length of 'k' is incorrectly computed, resulting in its getting truncated during the computation. Legitimate transactions or communications will be broken as a result. Furthermore, due to the nature of the fault, attackers could–under certain conditions–derive the secret key, if they could get their hands on both a faulty signature generated by a vulnerable version of Elliptic and a correct signature for the same inputs. This issue affects all known versions of Elliptic (at the time of writing, versions less than or equal to 6.6.1).
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-14505 concerns a cryptographic vulnerability in the Elliptic package's implementation of the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). The issue stems from improper handling of the nonce 'k' used during signature generation, specifically when 'k' contains leading zeros. According to RFC 6979, 'k' should be deterministically generated to avoid nonce reuse and ensure security. However, Elliptic incorrectly computes the byte-length of 'k', leading to truncation of the value when leading zeros are present. This truncation results in incorrect signatures that can invalidate legitimate transactions or communications relying on these signatures. More critically, the flawed signature generation leaks information that can be exploited by attackers. If an attacker can obtain both a faulty signature generated by the vulnerable Elliptic version and a correct signature for the same input, they may perform cryptanalysis to recover the secret private key. This key exposure compromises the confidentiality and integrity of cryptographic operations. The vulnerability affects all known Elliptic versions up to 6.6.1. The CVSS v3.1 score is 5.6 (medium), reflecting network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No patches are currently linked, and no exploits have been observed in the wild, but the risk remains significant due to the potential for secret key compromise.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk to the security of cryptographic operations that rely on Elliptic's ECDSA implementation, including digital signatures for transactions, communications, and authentication mechanisms. Secret key exposure could lead to unauthorized transaction signing, data forgery, and impersonation attacks, undermining trust in digital services. Financial institutions, government agencies, and critical infrastructure operators using Elliptic for cryptographic functions could face operational disruptions and data breaches. The breaking of legitimate signatures may cause transaction failures or communication breakdowns, impacting business continuity. Additionally, the potential for key recovery by attackers elevates the risk of long-term compromise and lateral movement within affected networks. Given the medium CVSS score and the complexity of exploitation, the threat is moderate but should not be underestimated, especially in sectors with high reliance on cryptographic integrity and confidentiality.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately identify and inventory all systems and applications using the Elliptic package, specifically versions 6.6.1 or earlier. They should prioritize upgrading to a patched version once available or apply vendor-recommended fixes. In the absence of an official patch, consider implementing cryptographic workarounds such as avoiding the use of vulnerable ECDSA implementations or switching to alternative, well-vetted cryptographic libraries. Conduct key rotation for all affected cryptographic keys to prevent exploitation of potentially compromised keys. Implement enhanced monitoring for anomalous signature verification failures and suspicious cryptographic operations. Restrict network access to systems performing sensitive cryptographic functions to reduce attack surface. Educate developers and security teams about the risks of nonce handling in ECDSA and enforce secure coding practices aligned with RFC 6979. Finally, maintain incident response readiness to quickly address any signs of compromise related to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Finland
CVE-2025-14505: CWE-1240: Use of a Cryptographic Primitive with a Risky Implementation in Elliptic
Description
The ECDSA implementation of the Elliptic package generates incorrect signatures if an interim value of 'k' (as computed based on step 3.2 of RFC 6979 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6979 ) has leading zeros and is susceptible to cryptanalysis, which can lead to secret key exposure. This happens, because the byte-length of 'k' is incorrectly computed, resulting in its getting truncated during the computation. Legitimate transactions or communications will be broken as a result. Furthermore, due to the nature of the fault, attackers could–under certain conditions–derive the secret key, if they could get their hands on both a faulty signature generated by a vulnerable version of Elliptic and a correct signature for the same inputs. This issue affects all known versions of Elliptic (at the time of writing, versions less than or equal to 6.6.1).
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-14505 concerns a cryptographic vulnerability in the Elliptic package's implementation of the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). The issue stems from improper handling of the nonce 'k' used during signature generation, specifically when 'k' contains leading zeros. According to RFC 6979, 'k' should be deterministically generated to avoid nonce reuse and ensure security. However, Elliptic incorrectly computes the byte-length of 'k', leading to truncation of the value when leading zeros are present. This truncation results in incorrect signatures that can invalidate legitimate transactions or communications relying on these signatures. More critically, the flawed signature generation leaks information that can be exploited by attackers. If an attacker can obtain both a faulty signature generated by the vulnerable Elliptic version and a correct signature for the same input, they may perform cryptanalysis to recover the secret private key. This key exposure compromises the confidentiality and integrity of cryptographic operations. The vulnerability affects all known Elliptic versions up to 6.6.1. The CVSS v3.1 score is 5.6 (medium), reflecting network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No patches are currently linked, and no exploits have been observed in the wild, but the risk remains significant due to the potential for secret key compromise.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk to the security of cryptographic operations that rely on Elliptic's ECDSA implementation, including digital signatures for transactions, communications, and authentication mechanisms. Secret key exposure could lead to unauthorized transaction signing, data forgery, and impersonation attacks, undermining trust in digital services. Financial institutions, government agencies, and critical infrastructure operators using Elliptic for cryptographic functions could face operational disruptions and data breaches. The breaking of legitimate signatures may cause transaction failures or communication breakdowns, impacting business continuity. Additionally, the potential for key recovery by attackers elevates the risk of long-term compromise and lateral movement within affected networks. Given the medium CVSS score and the complexity of exploitation, the threat is moderate but should not be underestimated, especially in sectors with high reliance on cryptographic integrity and confidentiality.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately identify and inventory all systems and applications using the Elliptic package, specifically versions 6.6.1 or earlier. They should prioritize upgrading to a patched version once available or apply vendor-recommended fixes. In the absence of an official patch, consider implementing cryptographic workarounds such as avoiding the use of vulnerable ECDSA implementations or switching to alternative, well-vetted cryptographic libraries. Conduct key rotation for all affected cryptographic keys to prevent exploitation of potentially compromised keys. Implement enhanced monitoring for anomalous signature verification failures and suspicious cryptographic operations. Restrict network access to systems performing sensitive cryptographic functions to reduce attack surface. Educate developers and security teams about the risks of nonce handling in ECDSA and enforce secure coding practices aligned with RFC 6979. Finally, maintain incident response readiness to quickly address any signs of compromise related to this vulnerability.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- HeroDevs
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-10T22:37:46.175Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69602115ecefc3cd7c4b694d
Added to database: 1/8/2026, 9:26:45 PM
Last enriched: 1/8/2026, 9:34:19 PM
Last updated: 1/9/2026, 3:51:44 PM
Views: 30
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-0803: SQL Injection in PHPGurukul Online Course Registration System
MediumCVE-2025-67133: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-46644: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain with Data Domain Operating System (DD OS) Feature Release
MediumCVE-2024-47258: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation in 2N 2N Access Commander
HighCVE-2024-47256: CWE-321: Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key in 2N 2N Access Commander
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.