VulnerabilityPublished 28 Jan 2026Updated 5 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-15344: Tanium Asset · SQL Injection

Affects Tanium AssetSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.3 Medium · fixed in 1.33.250 : update Tanium Asset when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 1.33.250, 1.32.161, 1.28.254

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 28 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Tanium Asset to 1.33.250, 1.32.161 or 1.28.254.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
TaniumAsset	Affected >=1.33.0 <1.33.250	Fixed in 1.33.250
TaniumAsset	Affected >=1.32.0 <1.32.161	Fixed in 1.32.161
TaniumAsset	Affected >=1.28.0 <1.28.254	Fixed in 1.28.254

CPE configurations (3)

cpe:2.3:a:tanium:service_asset:1.28.253:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:tanium:service_asset:1.32.160:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:tanium:service_asset:1.33.249:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately verify if they are running affected versions of Tanium Asset (1.28.254, 1.32.161, 1.33.250) and prioritize upgrading to the latest patched versions provided by Tanium. In the absence of direct patch links, contacting Tanium support for official updates is recommended. Network segmentation should be enforced to limit access to Tanium Asset interfaces to authorized personnel only. Implement strict role-based access controls (RBAC) to minimize privileges required to interact with the system, reducing the risk posed by low-privilege attackers. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with SQL injection detection capabilities to monitor and block suspicious queries targeting the asset management system. Regularly audit and monitor logs for unusual database query patterns or access attempts. Additionally, conduct internal penetration testing focused on SQL injection vectors to validate the effectiveness of mitigations. Finally, ensure that incident response plans include scenarios involving asset management system compromise to enable rapid containment and recovery.

Description

Tanium addressed a SQL injection vulnerability in Asset.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-15344 could be significant, especially for those relying on Tanium Asset for critical asset management and endpoint security functions. Successful exploitation may lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive asset information, modification of asset records, or disruption of asset management services, potentially undermining security monitoring and response capabilities. This could increase the risk of further compromise or operational disruption. Given the medium severity and ease of exploitation with low privileges, attackers could leverage this vulnerability as a foothold or pivot point within enterprise networks. The impact is particularly relevant for sectors with stringent compliance requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies across Europe. Additionally, the vulnerability could affect supply chain security if Tanium Asset is used by managed service providers or third parties supporting European organizations.

References

security.tanium.com/TAN-2025-035 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…