CVE-2025-29481: n/a
CVE-2025-29481 is a buffer overflow vulnerability in libbpf version 1. 5. 0, specifically in the bpf_object__init_prog function. It allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code by passing crafted input to libbpf. Exploitation requires local access and no user interaction or privileges are needed, but the attack surface is limited to local users. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6. 2 (medium severity) and does not impact confidentiality or integrity but can cause denial of service or code execution affecting availability. The vulnerability is disputed by some experts who argue that passing untrusted ELF files to libbpf as root is an unlikely scenario. No known exploits are currently in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet. Organizations using libbpf, especially in Linux environments with local user access, should be cautious and monitor for updates.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-29481 identifies a buffer overflow vulnerability in libbpf version 1.5.0, a widely used library for interacting with the Linux kernel's eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) subsystem. The flaw exists in the bpf_object__init_prog function, which is responsible for initializing BPF programs from ELF files. A local attacker can exploit this vulnerability by supplying a specially crafted ELF file that triggers a buffer overflow, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution within the context of the calling process. The vulnerability requires local access but no elevated privileges or user interaction, making it a low-complexity attack vector. However, exploitation is constrained by the need to pass untrusted ELF files to libbpf, which is generally discouraged, especially under root privileges. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.2, reflecting a medium severity primarily due to the local attack vector and limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-120 (Classic Buffer Overflow). No public exploits or patches have been reported at the time of publication, and some security experts dispute the practical risk due to the expected usage patterns of libbpf. Nevertheless, the vulnerability highlights the importance of careful input validation when handling ELF files in privileged contexts.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-29481 is the potential for local attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service on systems using libbpf 1.5.0. This can lead to system instability or compromise of availability. Since the vulnerability requires local access and does not affect confidentiality or integrity directly, the risk is somewhat limited to environments where untrusted local users exist. Systems running Linux distributions that incorporate libbpf for eBPF program loading, especially those with multi-user access or development environments, are at risk. Exploitation could allow attackers to escalate privileges if combined with other vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the vulnerability could be leveraged in targeted attacks against critical infrastructure or development systems that rely on eBPF for performance monitoring, security, or networking. Organizations with sensitive Linux environments should consider the potential for disruption or unauthorized code execution.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-29481, organizations should: 1) Restrict local user access to trusted personnel only, minimizing the risk of untrusted ELF files being processed by libbpf. 2) Avoid running libbpf-related processes with root privileges unless absolutely necessary, and never pass untrusted ELF files to libbpf under elevated privileges. 3) Monitor vendor and open-source project updates for patches addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 4) Implement strict file integrity monitoring and validation for ELF files used in eBPF program loading to detect and block malicious inputs. 5) Employ Linux security modules (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) to constrain the capabilities of processes interacting with libbpf, limiting potential damage from exploitation. 6) Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on local privilege escalation vectors involving eBPF and libbpf. 7) Educate system administrators and developers about the risks of handling untrusted ELF files and enforce secure coding and operational practices around eBPF usage.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, Australia, Netherlands
CVE-2025-29481: n/a
Description
CVE-2025-29481 is a buffer overflow vulnerability in libbpf version 1. 5. 0, specifically in the bpf_object__init_prog function. It allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code by passing crafted input to libbpf. Exploitation requires local access and no user interaction or privileges are needed, but the attack surface is limited to local users. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6. 2 (medium severity) and does not impact confidentiality or integrity but can cause denial of service or code execution affecting availability. The vulnerability is disputed by some experts who argue that passing untrusted ELF files to libbpf as root is an unlikely scenario. No known exploits are currently in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet. Organizations using libbpf, especially in Linux environments with local user access, should be cautious and monitor for updates.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-29481 identifies a buffer overflow vulnerability in libbpf version 1.5.0, a widely used library for interacting with the Linux kernel's eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) subsystem. The flaw exists in the bpf_object__init_prog function, which is responsible for initializing BPF programs from ELF files. A local attacker can exploit this vulnerability by supplying a specially crafted ELF file that triggers a buffer overflow, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution within the context of the calling process. The vulnerability requires local access but no elevated privileges or user interaction, making it a low-complexity attack vector. However, exploitation is constrained by the need to pass untrusted ELF files to libbpf, which is generally discouraged, especially under root privileges. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.2, reflecting a medium severity primarily due to the local attack vector and limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-120 (Classic Buffer Overflow). No public exploits or patches have been reported at the time of publication, and some security experts dispute the practical risk due to the expected usage patterns of libbpf. Nevertheless, the vulnerability highlights the importance of careful input validation when handling ELF files in privileged contexts.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-29481 is the potential for local attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service on systems using libbpf 1.5.0. This can lead to system instability or compromise of availability. Since the vulnerability requires local access and does not affect confidentiality or integrity directly, the risk is somewhat limited to environments where untrusted local users exist. Systems running Linux distributions that incorporate libbpf for eBPF program loading, especially those with multi-user access or development environments, are at risk. Exploitation could allow attackers to escalate privileges if combined with other vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the vulnerability could be leveraged in targeted attacks against critical infrastructure or development systems that rely on eBPF for performance monitoring, security, or networking. Organizations with sensitive Linux environments should consider the potential for disruption or unauthorized code execution.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-29481, organizations should: 1) Restrict local user access to trusted personnel only, minimizing the risk of untrusted ELF files being processed by libbpf. 2) Avoid running libbpf-related processes with root privileges unless absolutely necessary, and never pass untrusted ELF files to libbpf under elevated privileges. 3) Monitor vendor and open-source project updates for patches addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 4) Implement strict file integrity monitoring and validation for ELF files used in eBPF program loading to detect and block malicious inputs. 5) Employ Linux security modules (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) to constrain the capabilities of processes interacting with libbpf, limiting potential damage from exploitation. 6) Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on local privilege escalation vectors involving eBPF and libbpf. 7) Educate system administrators and developers about the risks of handling untrusted ELF files and enforce secure coding and operational practices around eBPF usage.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2025-03-11T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 699eab2eb7ef31ef0be8930a
Added to database: 2/25/2026, 7:56:30 AM
Last enriched: 2/25/2026, 8:11:03 AM
Last updated: 2/25/2026, 9:45:48 AM
Views: 3
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2410: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in themeisle Disable Admin Notices – Hide Dashboard Notifications
MediumCVE-2026-2367: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ays-pro Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking
MediumCVE-2026-2301: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in metaphorcreations Post Duplicator
MediumCVE-2025-14742: CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in brechtvds WP Recipe Maker
MediumCVE-2026-3171: Cross Site Scripting in SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.