VulnerabilityPublished 5 Mar 2026

CVE-2025-30413: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent · Incorrect Permissions

Affects Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud AgentSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.4 Medium : upgrade to 40497 when convenient.

Data as of 29 Oct 2026, 19:04 UTC

CVSS 3.0 base score

4.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 5% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 40497, 41186

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 5 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Acronis Cyber Protect to 40497 (Cloud Agent) or 41186 (17).

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
AcronisAcronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent	Affected ≥ unspecified, < 40497	Fixed in 40497
AcronisAcronis Cyber Protect 17	Affected ≥ unspecified, < 41186	Fixed in 41186

AI-suggested

2) Implement strict access controls to limit local administrative privileges on systems running affected Acronis agents, reducing the risk of credential exposure. 3) Regularly audit and revoke credentials and tokens associated with backup plans, ensuring no stale credentials remain. 4) Employ endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to monitor for suspicious local access or credential dumping activities. 5) Use encryption and secure storage mechanisms for credentials where possible, and verify that credential deletion processes are effective post-plan revocation. 6) Conduct periodic security reviews of backup and protection agent configurations to ensure compliance with least privilege principles. 7) Educate system administrators about the risks of credential persistence and the importance of timely plan revocation and cleanup.

Description

Credentials are not deleted from Acronis Agent after plan revocation. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 40497, Acronis Cyber Protect 17 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41186.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2025-30413 is unauthorized access to sensitive credentials stored by the Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent after plan revocation. This can lead to confidentiality breaches, allowing attackers with local high privileges to potentially access backup data or management functions that rely on these credentials. Although the vulnerability does not affect data integrity or system availability directly, the exposure of credentials could facilitate further lateral movement or privilege escalation within an organization's environment. Organizations relying on Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent for backup and protection services may face increased risk of insider threats or compromised endpoints if this vulnerability is exploited. The requirement for local high privileges limits remote exploitation but does not eliminate risk in environments where multiple users have elevated access or where endpoint compromise has already occurred.

CWE-732Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors.
Implementation
When using a critical resource such as a configuration file, check to see if the resource has insecure permissions (such as being modifiable by any regular user), and generate an error or even exit the software if there is a possibility that the resource could have been modified by an unauthorized party.
Architecture and Design
Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully defining distinct user groups, privileges, and/or roles. Map these against data, functionality, and the related resources. Then set the permissions accordingly.
Architecture and Design · Operation · Sandbox or Jail
Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
REST Assessment (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V4.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (opens in a new tab)
Directory Indexing (opens in a new tab)
Using Malicious Files (opens in a new tab)
Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (opens in a new tab)
Signing Malicious Code (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 13 Mar 2026, 19:51 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-732

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats