Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-33193: CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value in NVIDIA DGX Spark

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-33193cvecve-2025-33193cwe-354
Published: Tue Nov 25 2025 (11/25/2025, 17:59:10 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: NVIDIA
Product: DGX Spark

Description

NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in SROOT firmware, where an attacker could cause improper validation of integrity. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 12/02/2025, 18:51:39 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-33193 is a vulnerability identified in the SROOT firmware component of NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 systems, specifically in versions prior to the OTA0 update. The core issue is an improper validation of an integrity check value, classified under CWE-354 (Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value). This flaw allows an attacker with local access to the device to bypass integrity checks, potentially leading to unauthorized information disclosure. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.7, reflecting a medium severity level. The attack vector is local (AV:L), requiring no privileges (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N), but the scope is changed (S:C), indicating that the vulnerability affects resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. The impact on confidentiality is limited (C:L), with no impact on integrity (I:N), and a low impact on availability (A:L). The vulnerability does not currently have any known exploits in the wild, and no patches have been publicly released yet. The DGX Spark platform is widely used in high-performance computing and AI workloads, making the integrity of its firmware critical. Improper validation of integrity checks can allow attackers to extract sensitive information or manipulate firmware behavior, undermining system trustworthiness. Given the complexity and criticality of these systems, this vulnerability could have significant operational and data confidentiality implications if exploited.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, especially those involved in research, AI development, and high-performance computing, this vulnerability poses a risk of information disclosure from compromised NVIDIA DGX Spark systems. Although exploitation requires local access, the sensitive nature of data processed on these platforms means that any leakage could have serious consequences, including intellectual property theft or exposure of confidential research data. The medium severity rating reflects limited confidentiality impact and no integrity compromise, but availability could be affected to a small extent. The vulnerability could disrupt operations if attackers leverage it to degrade system performance or stability. Organizations relying heavily on DGX Spark infrastructure for critical workloads may face operational delays and reputational damage if the vulnerability is exploited. Additionally, the lack of available patches increases the window of exposure. European entities with stringent data protection regulations, such as GDPR, must consider the potential compliance implications of any data leakage resulting from this vulnerability.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Restrict physical and local access to NVIDIA DGX Spark systems to trusted personnel only, as exploitation requires local access. 2. Implement strict access controls and monitoring on management interfaces and local consoles to detect unauthorized attempts. 3. Monitor system logs and firmware behavior for anomalies indicative of integrity check bypass attempts. 4. Coordinate with NVIDIA for timely firmware updates and apply the OTA0 update as soon as it becomes available. 5. Employ network segmentation to isolate DGX Spark systems from less secure network zones, reducing the risk of lateral movement. 6. Conduct regular security audits and firmware integrity checks to detect unauthorized modifications. 7. Educate staff on the importance of firmware security and the risks associated with local access vulnerabilities. 8. Consider deploying hardware security modules or trusted platform modules (TPMs) if supported, to enhance firmware integrity verification. These steps go beyond generic advice by emphasizing physical security, proactive monitoring, and coordination with the vendor for patch management.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
nvidia
Date Reserved
2025-04-15T18:51:03.729Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6925f0bc94b153c6e1167e9e

Added to database: 11/25/2025, 6:09:00 PM

Last enriched: 12/2/2025, 6:51:39 PM

Last updated: 12/4/2025, 11:49:22 PM

Views: 44

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats