VulnerabilityPublished 23 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-35981: Gallagher Command Centre Server · Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor

Affects Gallagher Command Centre ServerSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 12:29 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately review and tighten access controls for privileged operators within Gallagher Command Centre Server, ensuring the principle of least privilege is strictly enforced. Implement role-based access controls (RBAC) that limit data visibility to only what is necessary for each operator’s role. Enable detailed logging and continuous monitoring of operator activities to detect any unauthorized access to personal data. Conduct regular audits of access logs and investigate anomalies promptly. Segregate duties where possible to reduce the risk of a single operator accessing sensitive data beyond their scope. Engage with Gallagher to obtain and apply security patches or updates addressing this vulnerability as soon as they become available. Additionally, consider implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for operator accounts to reduce the risk of credential compromise. Train staff on the importance of data privacy and insider threat awareness. Finally, review and update incident response plans to include scenarios involving insider data exposure.

Description

Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor (CWE-359) in the Command Centre Server allows a privileged Operator to view limited personal data about a Cardholder they would not normally have permissions to view. This issue affects Command Centre Server: 9.30.1874 (MR1), 9.20.2337 (MR3), 9.10.3194 (MR6).

Impact

For European organizations, the exposure of private personal information through this vulnerability can lead to significant privacy compliance issues under GDPR, which mandates strict controls over personal data access and processing. Unauthorized viewing of cardholder data by privileged operators could result in data breaches, loss of trust, and regulatory penalties. Organizations relying on Gallagher Command Centre for managing physical access to sensitive facilities—such as government buildings, critical infrastructure, healthcare, and financial institutions—may face increased insider threat risks. The confidentiality breach could also facilitate social engineering or targeted attacks if personal data is leveraged maliciously. While the vulnerability does not impact system integrity or availability, the reputational damage and potential legal consequences from privacy violations can be substantial. Additionally, the need to audit and monitor privileged user activity will increase operational overhead. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially from malicious insiders or compromised operator accounts.

CWE-359Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not properly prevent a person's private, personal information from being accessed by actors who either (1) are not explicitly authorized to access the information or (2) do not have the implicit consent of the person about whom the information is collected.
Requirements
Identify and consult all relevant regulations for personal privacy. An organization may be required to comply with certain federal and state regulations, depending on its location, the type of business it conducts, and the nature of any private data it handles.
Architecture and Design
Carefully evaluate how secure design may interfere with privacy, and vice versa. Security and privacy concerns often seem to compete with each other. From a security perspective, all important operations should be recorded so that any anomalous activity can later be identified.
Implementation · Operation · Attack Surface Reduction
Some tools can automatically analyze documents to redact, strip, or "sanitize" private information, although some human review might be necessary. Tools may vary in terms of which document formats can be processed.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V10.2.1 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Evercookie (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Identification (opens in a new tab)
Probe iOS Screenshots (opens in a new tab)
Shoulder Surfing (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

security.gallagher.com/en-NZ/Security-Advisories/CVE-2025-35981 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Oct 2025, 04:41 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-359

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats