CVE-2025-53637: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in meshtastic firmware
Meshtastic is an open source mesh networking solution. The main_matrix.yml GitHub Action is triggered by the pull_request_target event, which has extensive permissions, and can be initiated by an attacker who forked the repository and created a pull request. In the shell code execution part, user-controlled input is interpolated unsafely into the code. If this were to be exploited, attackers could inject unauthorized code into the repository. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.6.6.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-53637 is an OS command injection vulnerability identified in the Meshtastic firmware, an open source mesh networking solution. The vulnerability arises from unsafe interpolation of user-controlled input within a GitHub Action workflow file named main_matrix.yml. This workflow is triggered by the pull_request_target event, which inherently has extensive permissions and can be initiated by an attacker who forks the repository and submits a pull request. Because the pull_request_target event runs with write permissions on the base repository, the unsafe handling of user input in shell code execution allows an attacker to inject arbitrary OS commands. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution within the repository environment, potentially compromising the integrity of the codebase or enabling further malicious activities such as supply chain attacks. The vulnerability affects Meshtastic firmware versions from 2.5.3 up to, but not including, 2.6.6, where the issue has been fixed. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 4.1 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, required privileges (PR:L), and user interaction (UI:R), with a scope change and limited confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild. This vulnerability is classified under CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), highlighting the risk of command injection due to improper input sanitization in automated CI/CD workflows.
Potential Impact
For European organizations utilizing Meshtastic firmware in their mesh networking infrastructure, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the software development lifecycle and supply chain integrity rather than direct operational disruption. Exploitation could allow attackers to inject malicious code into the repository, potentially leading to compromised firmware releases or backdoored updates distributed to end devices. This could undermine confidentiality if sensitive data is exfiltrated via compromised firmware or integrity if unauthorized code modifications propagate to production devices. Although the direct impact on availability is minimal, the broader implications for trust in the firmware and network security are significant. Organizations relying on Meshtastic for critical communication, especially in sectors like emergency services, public safety, or remote connectivity in Europe, could face reputational damage and operational risks if compromised firmware is deployed. The medium severity score indicates a moderate risk level, but the potential for supply chain compromise elevates the importance of addressing this vulnerability promptly.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade Meshtastic firmware to version 2.6.6 or later, where this vulnerability is patched. 2. Review and restrict the use of the pull_request_target event in GitHub Actions workflows, as it runs with elevated permissions; consider replacing it with safer alternatives like pull_request or workflow_run events that have limited privileges. 3. Implement strict input validation and sanitization for any user-controlled data interpolated into shell commands within CI/CD pipelines. 4. Employ repository protection rules to limit who can trigger workflows with elevated permissions, including restricting forked repository pull requests from triggering sensitive workflows. 5. Monitor CI/CD pipeline logs for unusual or unexpected command executions or pull request activity. 6. Conduct regular security audits of automated workflows and infrastructure as code to detect unsafe coding patterns. 7. Educate development teams on secure GitHub Actions practices and the risks of command injection in automation scripts. 8. Consider implementing signed commits and reproducible builds to detect unauthorized code changes introduced via compromised workflows.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark
CVE-2025-53637: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in meshtastic firmware
Description
Meshtastic is an open source mesh networking solution. The main_matrix.yml GitHub Action is triggered by the pull_request_target event, which has extensive permissions, and can be initiated by an attacker who forked the repository and created a pull request. In the shell code execution part, user-controlled input is interpolated unsafely into the code. If this were to be exploited, attackers could inject unauthorized code into the repository. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.6.6.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-53637 is an OS command injection vulnerability identified in the Meshtastic firmware, an open source mesh networking solution. The vulnerability arises from unsafe interpolation of user-controlled input within a GitHub Action workflow file named main_matrix.yml. This workflow is triggered by the pull_request_target event, which inherently has extensive permissions and can be initiated by an attacker who forks the repository and submits a pull request. Because the pull_request_target event runs with write permissions on the base repository, the unsafe handling of user input in shell code execution allows an attacker to inject arbitrary OS commands. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution within the repository environment, potentially compromising the integrity of the codebase or enabling further malicious activities such as supply chain attacks. The vulnerability affects Meshtastic firmware versions from 2.5.3 up to, but not including, 2.6.6, where the issue has been fixed. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 4.1 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, required privileges (PR:L), and user interaction (UI:R), with a scope change and limited confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild. This vulnerability is classified under CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), highlighting the risk of command injection due to improper input sanitization in automated CI/CD workflows.
Potential Impact
For European organizations utilizing Meshtastic firmware in their mesh networking infrastructure, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the software development lifecycle and supply chain integrity rather than direct operational disruption. Exploitation could allow attackers to inject malicious code into the repository, potentially leading to compromised firmware releases or backdoored updates distributed to end devices. This could undermine confidentiality if sensitive data is exfiltrated via compromised firmware or integrity if unauthorized code modifications propagate to production devices. Although the direct impact on availability is minimal, the broader implications for trust in the firmware and network security are significant. Organizations relying on Meshtastic for critical communication, especially in sectors like emergency services, public safety, or remote connectivity in Europe, could face reputational damage and operational risks if compromised firmware is deployed. The medium severity score indicates a moderate risk level, but the potential for supply chain compromise elevates the importance of addressing this vulnerability promptly.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade Meshtastic firmware to version 2.6.6 or later, where this vulnerability is patched. 2. Review and restrict the use of the pull_request_target event in GitHub Actions workflows, as it runs with elevated permissions; consider replacing it with safer alternatives like pull_request or workflow_run events that have limited privileges. 3. Implement strict input validation and sanitization for any user-controlled data interpolated into shell commands within CI/CD pipelines. 4. Employ repository protection rules to limit who can trigger workflows with elevated permissions, including restricting forked repository pull requests from triggering sensitive workflows. 5. Monitor CI/CD pipeline logs for unusual or unexpected command executions or pull request activity. 6. Conduct regular security audits of automated workflows and infrastructure as code to detect unsafe coding patterns. 7. Educate development teams on secure GitHub Actions practices and the risks of command injection in automation scripts. 8. Consider implementing signed commits and reproducible builds to detect unauthorized code changes introduced via compromised workflows.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-07-07T14:20:38.390Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6870349fa83201eaacaa23f6
Added to database: 7/10/2025, 9:46:07 PM
Last enriched: 7/10/2025, 10:01:24 PM
Last updated: 10/10/2025, 1:56:26 AM
Views: 41
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2024-8285: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
MediumCVE-2024-7319: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
MediumCVE-2024-50312: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16
MediumCVE-2024-50311: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18
MediumCVE-2024-4812: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.