VulnerabilityPublished 18 Mar 2026Updated 19 Mar 2026

CVE-2025-55044: MuraCMS · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.8 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.8High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Affects: MuraCMS up to 10.1.10

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-55044, organizations should: 1) Immediately apply any available patches or updates from MuraCMS once released. 2) If patches are not yet available, implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block suspicious POST requests to the cTrash.restore endpoint, especially those lacking valid CSRF tokens or originating from external referrers. 3) Enforce strict administrator browsing policies to avoid visiting untrusted or unknown websites while logged into MuraCMS. 4) Implement or verify the presence of anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations, including content restoration functions, to prevent forged requests. 5) Conduct security awareness training for administrators emphasizing the risks of CSRF and safe browsing habits. 6) Monitor logs for unusual content restoration activities or unexpected changes in website structure. 7) Review and restrict administrator privileges to the minimum necessary to reduce the attack surface. 8) Consider isolating administrative interfaces behind VPNs or IP allowlists to reduce exposure. These targeted measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific vulnerable function and attack vector.

Description

CVE-2025-55044 is a high-severity Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MuraCMS up to version 10.1.10. It allows attackers to restore deleted content from the trash to arbitrary locations without proper authorization by exploiting the lack of CSRF token validation in the cTrash.restore function. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious webpage, their browser can be tricked into submitting a hidden form that restores content to attacker-specified parent locations. This can lead to unauthorized restoration of malicious or sensitive content, manipulation of site structure, or exposure of sensitive documents. The vulnerability requires user interaction (administrator visiting a crafted page) but no additional privileges beyond administrator authentication. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild. The CVSS v3.

Impact

The impact of CVE-2025-55044 on organizations using MuraCMS is significant. Successful exploitation allows attackers to restore deleted content without authorization, potentially reintroducing malicious code, outdated or vulnerable content, or sensitive documents into the website. This can lead to website defacement, data leakage, or compromise of the website’s integrity and trustworthiness. Restored malicious content could be used to launch further attacks against site visitors or internal users. Unauthorized restoration of sensitive documents may result in compliance violations or data breaches. Manipulation of the website navigation or content structure can disrupt normal operations and damage brand reputation. Since the attack requires an authenticated administrator to visit a malicious page, organizations with many administrators or less stringent browsing policies are at higher risk. The vulnerability affects confidentiality, integrity, and availability of web content, potentially impacting business continuity and regulatory compliance. Although no known exploits are reported, the ease of exploitation via social engineering and the high privileges required make this a critical risk for affected MuraCMS deployments worldwide.

CWE-352Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Compound weaknessLikelihood of exploit: MediumCWE Top 25 (2025): #3OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Architecture and Design
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330).
OWASP Cheat Sheets
REST Assessment (opens in a new tab)
REST Security (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization Testing Automation (opens in a new tab)
Insecure Direct Object Reference Prevention (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
V4.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
V13.3.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Domain Search Timing (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Identification (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 26 Mar 2026, 01:17 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-352

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats