VulnerabilityPublished 5 Jan 2026

CVE-2025-67427: evershop · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affects evershopSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 12:55 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 10% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 5 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubevershopcommerce/evershop`pkg:github/evershopcommerce/evershop`Other threats	Affected <=2.1.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the "src" query parameter to allow only trusted and expected URIs, ideally using a whitelist approach.
Restrict outbound HTTP/HTTPS requests from the evershop server to only necessary external endpoints, blocking access to internal IP ranges and sensitive metadata services.
Employ network segmentation and firewall rules to limit the server's ability to reach internal services that should not be externally accessible.
Monitor server logs and network traffic for unusual outbound requests or patterns indicative of SSRF exploitation attempts.
If possible, upgrade to a patched version of evershop once available or apply vendor-provided mitigations.
Use Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block SSRF attack patterns targeting the "src" parameter.
Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on SSRF and related vulnerabilities.
Educate development teams about secure coding practices to prevent similar input validation issues in the future.

Description

CVE-2025-67427 is a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affecting evershop version 2.1.0 and earlier. It allows unauthenticated attackers to exploit the "GET /images" API endpoint by manipulating the "src" query parameter to force the server to initiate arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS requests. This occurs due to insufficient validation of the input, enabling attackers to make requests to internal or external network resources without authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 6.5, indicating medium severity, primarily impacting confidentiality and integrity but not availability. No known exploits are currently in the wild, and no official patches have been released yet. European organizations using evershop 2.1.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized internal network reconnaissance and potential data leakage, which can compromise sensitive business information and customer data. Evershop is an e-commerce platform, so exploitation could lead to exposure of internal services, backend APIs, or cloud metadata endpoints, increasing the attack surface for further exploitation. The unauthenticated nature of the vulnerability means attackers can exploit it remotely without credentials, raising the threat level. Confidentiality and integrity of data may be impacted if attackers use SSRF to access internal resources or manipulate backend services. While availability is not directly affected, the vulnerability can facilitate lateral movement or privilege escalation within the network. Given the importance of e-commerce in Europe and strict data protection regulations such as GDPR, any data leakage or unauthorized access could result in regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Organizations relying on evershop should consider this vulnerability a medium risk but prioritize mitigation to prevent potential exploitation.

CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #22OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.2.6 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Server Side Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 12 Jan 2026, 21:39 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-918

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats