VulnerabilityPublished 3 Feb 2026Updated 4 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-70841: Dokans Multi-Tenancy Based eCommerce Platform SaaS · CVE-2025-70841 is a critical

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 10.0 Critical.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

10.0Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 36% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:N/A:N/C:H/I:H/PR:N/S:C/UI:N

Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Vector: Network
Availability: None
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Privileges Required: None
Scope: Changed
User Interaction: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation steps include restricting public access to the /script/.env file and any other sensitive configuration files by implementing strict web server access controls and proper file permissions. Organizations should verify that environment files are never served by the web server and are stored outside the web root directory. Applying patches or updates from the vendor, once available, is critical. In the absence of an official patch, consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules blocking requests to sensitive paths like /.env or /script/.env. Rotate all exposed credentials immediately, including database passwords, APP_KEY, and SMTP/SendGrid API keys, to invalidate any compromised secrets. Conduct a thorough audit of logs and systems for signs of compromise. Implement network segmentation to isolate tenant data and minimize lateral movement. Finally, review and enhance monitoring and alerting for unusual authentication or database access patterns to detect exploitation attempts early.

Description

CVE-2025-70841 is a critical vulnerability in Dokans Multi-Tenancy Based eCommerce Platform SaaS version 3.9.2 that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access the . env configuration file via a direct request to /script/. env. This file exposure reveals sensitive data including the Laravel APP_KEY, database credentials, and SMTP/SendGrid API keys. Exploiting this vulnerability enables attackers to bypass authentication through session token forgery, gain direct database access to all tenant data, and compromise the email infrastructure. Due to the multi-tenancy architecture, all tenants hosted on the platform are affected simultaneously. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 10, indicating critical severity with no authentication or user interaction required. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild.

Impact

For European organizations using Dokans Multi-Tenancy Based eCommerce Platform SaaS 3.9.2, this vulnerability poses a severe risk. The exposure of database credentials and encryption keys can lead to full data breaches affecting all tenants, resulting in loss of customer data, intellectual property, and financial information. Authentication bypass allows attackers to impersonate legitimate users, potentially leading to fraudulent transactions or unauthorized administrative actions. Email infrastructure compromise can facilitate phishing campaigns targeting customers or employees, increasing the risk of further social engineering attacks. The multi-tenant architecture means that a single exploited instance can cascade into widespread data loss across multiple organizations sharing the platform. This could lead to regulatory non-compliance under GDPR due to data breaches, resulting in heavy fines and reputational damage. Additionally, the disruption of eCommerce services can cause significant business interruption and financial losses.

CWE-287Improper Authentication (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)
V9.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Fake the Source of Data (opens in a new tab)
Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive Data (opens in a new tab)
Session Hijacking (opens in a new tab)
Token Impersonation (opens in a new tab)
Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 11 Feb 2026, 11:47 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-287

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats