CVE-2026-112178: MISP · Missing Authorization
Affects MISPSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.1 High : upgrade to 2.5.48 soon.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 12:29 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 13% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
- CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- No evidence of active exploitation and no public proof of concept
- Automatable
- Attackers cannot reliably automate steps 1–4 of the kill chain
- Technical impact
- Limited control over the software or limited information exposure
CISA SSVC assessment, 2026-10-19.
- Patch
- Available – fixed in 2.5.48
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
Upgrade MISP to 2.5.48.
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| MISPMISP | Affected
| Fixed in
|
GitHubMISPpkg:github/MISPOther threats | Affected
| Fixed in
|
CPE configurations (1)
cpe:2.3:a:misp:misp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.
AI-suggested
Upgrade MISP to version 2.5.48 or later, where this access control flaw has been fixed. There are no vendor advisories indicating alternative mitigations or that no action is required.
Description
MISP versions prior to 2.5.48 contain an access control vulnerability in the proposal visibility logic. Users in a sharing group could view proposed changes to attributes or objects associated with that group regardless of the intended distribution level restrictions. Additionally, the owning organisation could not view proposals on its own organisation-only attributes. This flaw leads to unauthorized disclosure of proposed attribute changes.