CVE-2026-21855VulnerabilityPublished 7 Jan 2026

CVE-2026-21855: the-hideout tarkov-data-manager · Cross-site Scripting

Affects the-hideout tarkov-data-managerSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.3 Critical.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.3Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 15% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
the-hideouttarkov-data-manager	Affected <=2.0.0	Fixed in–
GitHubthe-hideout/tarkov-data-manager`pkg:github/the-hideout/tarkov-data-manager`Other threats	Affected <=2.0.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediately update tarkov-data-manager to the latest version released after 2 January 2025 that contains the fix for CVE-2026-21855. 2. Implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data, especially in notification systems and any reflected content. 3. Deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in the browser context. 4. Educate users about the risks of clicking on untrusted links, particularly those that appear to come from the tarkov-data-manager interface or related communications. 5. Monitor web application logs for suspicious URL patterns that may indicate attempted exploitation. 6. Consider using web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block reflected XSS attempts. 7. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on input handling and client-side vulnerabilities. 8. Review and harden session management to limit the impact of session hijacking if an XSS attack occurs.

Description

The Tarkov Data Manager is a tool to manage the Tarkov item data. Prior to 02 January 2025, a reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the toast notification system allows any attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a victim's browser session by crafting a malicious URL. A series of fix commits on 02 January 2025 fixed this and other vulnerabilities.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality and integrity of user data and sessions. If exploited, attackers could hijack user sessions, steal sensitive information, or manipulate application behavior, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data breaches. Given the tool's niche use in managing gaming item data, the direct impact might be limited to organizations involved in gaming data analytics, development, or community management. However, the reflected XSS could be leveraged as an initial attack vector in broader targeted campaigns, especially if integrated into larger workflows or platforms. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or social engineering could facilitate exploitation. The vulnerability does not affect availability, but the potential for data compromise and trust erosion is high. European organizations with strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) could face compliance issues and reputational damage if exploited. The lack of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

github.com/the-hideout/tarkov-data-manager/security/advisories/GHSA-9c23-rrg9-jc89 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Jan 2026, 18:57 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats