CVE-2026-2393: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in mlflow mlflow/mlflow
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in MLflow versions prior to 3.9.0. The `_create_webhook()` function in `mlflow/server/handlers.py` accepts a user-controlled `url` parameter without validation, and the `_send_webhook_request()` function in `mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py` sends HTTP POST requests to this attacker-controlled URL. This allows an authenticated attacker to force the MLflow backend to send HTTP requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or arbitrary external servers. The lack of input sanitization, URL scheme filtering, or allowlist validation on the webhook URL enables exploitation, potentially leading to cloud credential theft, internal network access, and data exfiltration.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
MLflow versions before 3.9.0 contain an SSRF vulnerability (CWE-918) due to insufficient validation of a user-controlled URL parameter in webhook creation. The _create_webhook() function in mlflow/server/handlers.py accepts an attacker-controlled URL without sanitization or allowlist filtering. Subsequently, _send_webhook_request() in mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py issues HTTP POST requests to this URL. This flaw enables authenticated attackers to coerce the MLflow backend into making arbitrary HTTP requests to internal network services, cloud metadata endpoints, or external servers. The vulnerability can lead to exposure of sensitive internal resources or cloud credentials. The CVSS 3.0 base score is 7.1 (High), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, required privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality impact. No vendor advisory or patch information is currently available, and the affected versions are unspecified but prior to 3.9.0.
Potential Impact
An authenticated attacker can exploit this SSRF vulnerability to cause the MLflow backend to send HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs. This may result in unauthorized access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or external systems, potentially leading to cloud credential theft, internal network reconnaissance, or data exfiltration. The confidentiality impact is high, while integrity impact is low and availability impact is none, per the CVSS vector.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until an official fix is released, restrict access to MLflow backend interfaces to trusted users only, and monitor for suspicious webhook creation activity. Avoid exposing MLflow services to untrusted networks. Implement network-level controls to restrict outbound HTTP requests from the MLflow server to only necessary destinations.
CVE-2026-2393: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in mlflow mlflow/mlflow
Description
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in MLflow versions prior to 3.9.0. The `_create_webhook()` function in `mlflow/server/handlers.py` accepts a user-controlled `url` parameter without validation, and the `_send_webhook_request()` function in `mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py` sends HTTP POST requests to this attacker-controlled URL. This allows an authenticated attacker to force the MLflow backend to send HTTP requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or arbitrary external servers. The lack of input sanitization, URL scheme filtering, or allowlist validation on the webhook URL enables exploitation, potentially leading to cloud credential theft, internal network access, and data exfiltration.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
MLflow versions before 3.9.0 contain an SSRF vulnerability (CWE-918) due to insufficient validation of a user-controlled URL parameter in webhook creation. The _create_webhook() function in mlflow/server/handlers.py accepts an attacker-controlled URL without sanitization or allowlist filtering. Subsequently, _send_webhook_request() in mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py issues HTTP POST requests to this URL. This flaw enables authenticated attackers to coerce the MLflow backend into making arbitrary HTTP requests to internal network services, cloud metadata endpoints, or external servers. The vulnerability can lead to exposure of sensitive internal resources or cloud credentials. The CVSS 3.0 base score is 7.1 (High), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, required privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality impact. No vendor advisory or patch information is currently available, and the affected versions are unspecified but prior to 3.9.0.
Potential Impact
An authenticated attacker can exploit this SSRF vulnerability to cause the MLflow backend to send HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs. This may result in unauthorized access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or external systems, potentially leading to cloud credential theft, internal network reconnaissance, or data exfiltration. The confidentiality impact is high, while integrity impact is low and availability impact is none, per the CVSS vector.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until an official fix is released, restrict access to MLflow backend interfaces to trusted users only, and monitor for suspicious webhook creation activity. Avoid exposing MLflow services to untrusted networks. Implement network-level controls to restrict outbound HTTP requests from the MLflow server to only necessary destinations.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- @huntr_ai
- Date Reserved
- 2026-02-12T09:36:06.051Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
- Remediation Level
- null
Threat ID: 6a021042cbff5d86103d45c6
Added to database: 5/11/2026, 5:22:10 PM
Last enriched: 5/11/2026, 5:36:37 PM
Last updated: 5/12/2026, 3:52:38 AM
Views: 5
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.