Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-29781: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference in BishopFox sliver

0
Low
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-29781cvecve-2026-29781cwe-476
Published: Sat Mar 07 2026 (03/07/2026, 15:25:23 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: BishopFox
Product: sliver

Description

Sliver is a command and control framework that uses a custom Wireguard netstack. In versions from 1.7.3 and prior, a vulnerability exists in the Sliver C2 server's Protobuf unmarshalling logic due to a systemic lack of nil-pointer validation. By extracting valid implant credentials and omitting nested fields in a signed message, an authenticated actor can trigger an unhandled runtime panic. Because the mTLS, WireGuard, and DNS transport layers lack the panic recovery middleware present in the HTTP transport, this results in a global process termination. While requiring post-authentication access (a captured implant), this flaw effectively acts as an infrastructure "kill-switch," instantly severing all active sessions across the entire fleet and requiring a manual server restart to restore operations. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 03/14/2026, 19:56:59 UTC

Technical Analysis

Sliver is a widely used open-source command and control framework developed by BishopFox, leveraging a custom WireGuard netstack for implant communication. Versions up to and including 1.7.3 contain a vulnerability (CVE-2026-29781) stemming from improper handling of nil pointers during Protobuf message unmarshalling in the Sliver C2 server. Specifically, the server fails to validate nested fields in signed messages, allowing an authenticated actor who has extracted implant credentials to send crafted messages that omit these fields. This triggers a NULL pointer dereference, causing an unhandled runtime panic. The panic is not recovered in the mTLS, WireGuard, and DNS transport layers, resulting in a global process crash that terminates all active implant sessions simultaneously. This behavior effectively acts as a kill-switch, disrupting the entire Sliver infrastructure until the server is manually restarted. The HTTP transport layer is unaffected due to existing panic recovery middleware. Exploitation requires possession of valid implant credentials, limiting the attack surface to actors with post-authentication access. No public patches or mitigations are currently available, and no active exploitation has been observed. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference) and has a CVSS 4.0 score of 2.1, reflecting low severity due to limited impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability beyond denial of service requiring manual recovery.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-29781 is a denial-of-service condition that causes the Sliver C2 server process to crash, severing all active implant sessions across the entire managed fleet. This disruption can halt ongoing operations relying on Sliver implants, affecting incident response, red team engagements, or adversary operations that use Sliver as a C2 framework. Organizations using Sliver for offensive security or red teaming may experience operational downtime and loss of control over deployed implants until manual intervention restarts the server. Although no direct data breach or privilege escalation is enabled by this flaw, the forced downtime can impair mission-critical activities and reduce situational awareness. The requirement for post-authentication access limits exploitation to actors who have already compromised implant credentials, reducing the likelihood of widespread abuse. However, a malicious insider or advanced attacker with access could weaponize this vulnerability as an infrastructure kill-switch to disrupt red team operations or defensive monitoring. The absence of automatic recovery mechanisms increases operational risk and response time. Overall, the impact is primarily operational disruption rather than data compromise or persistent system compromise.

Mitigation Recommendations

Given the lack of publicly available patches, organizations should implement the following mitigations: 1) Restrict access to implant credentials and C2 server authentication tokens to minimize the risk of credential compromise. 2) Monitor Sliver server logs and network traffic for anomalous signed messages that omit nested fields or cause unexpected server crashes, enabling early detection of exploitation attempts. 3) Implement process supervision and automatic restart mechanisms (e.g., systemd, supervisor) for the Sliver server to reduce downtime caused by crashes. 4) Consider isolating the Sliver C2 server within segmented network environments to limit the blast radius of a forced restart. 5) Evaluate the use of the HTTP transport layer for implant communication where possible, as it includes panic recovery middleware that mitigates this vulnerability. 6) Maintain strict operational security around implant credential distribution and storage to prevent unauthorized post-authentication access. 7) Engage with BishopFox or the Sliver community for updates and patches addressing this issue. 8) Prepare incident response plans to quickly recover from forced Sliver server restarts to minimize operational impact.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2026-03-04T16:26:02.898Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69ac44bec48b3f10ffa88859

Added to database: 3/7/2026, 3:31:10 PM

Last enriched: 3/14/2026, 7:56:59 PM

Last updated: 4/21/2026, 11:30:29 PM

Views: 70

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses