CVE-2026-30306: n/a
In its design for automatic terminal command execution, SakaDev offers two options: Execute safe commands and execute all commands. The description for the former states that commands determined by the model to be safe will be automatically executed, whereas if the model judges a command to be potentially destructive, it still requires user approval. However, this design is highly susceptible to prompt injection attacks. An attacker can employ a generic template to wrap any malicious command and mislead the model into misclassifying it as a 'safe' command, thereby bypassing the user approval requirement and resulting in arbitrary command execution.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
SakaDev's design for automatic terminal command execution relies on a model to classify commands as safe or potentially destructive. The vulnerability arises because attackers can use prompt injection techniques to manipulate the model into misclassifying malicious commands as safe. This bypasses the intended user approval step for dangerous commands, allowing arbitrary command execution without user consent. The vulnerability is identified as CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code). It is rated critical with a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8, reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Potential Impact
Successful exploitation allows an attacker to execute arbitrary terminal commands automatically without user approval, potentially leading to full system compromise. The impact includes complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. Given the high CVSS score and critical severity, this vulnerability poses a severe risk to affected deployments.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until an official fix is available, users should disable or avoid using the automatic execution of commands feature, especially the 'execute safe commands' mode. Implement strict input validation and consider manual review of commands to prevent prompt injection. Monitor vendor channels for updates and patches addressing this vulnerability.
CVE-2026-30306: n/a
Description
In its design for automatic terminal command execution, SakaDev offers two options: Execute safe commands and execute all commands. The description for the former states that commands determined by the model to be safe will be automatically executed, whereas if the model judges a command to be potentially destructive, it still requires user approval. However, this design is highly susceptible to prompt injection attacks. An attacker can employ a generic template to wrap any malicious command and mislead the model into misclassifying it as a 'safe' command, thereby bypassing the user approval requirement and resulting in arbitrary command execution.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
SakaDev's design for automatic terminal command execution relies on a model to classify commands as safe or potentially destructive. The vulnerability arises because attackers can use prompt injection techniques to manipulate the model into misclassifying malicious commands as safe. This bypasses the intended user approval step for dangerous commands, allowing arbitrary command execution without user consent. The vulnerability is identified as CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code). It is rated critical with a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8, reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Potential Impact
Successful exploitation allows an attacker to execute arbitrary terminal commands automatically without user approval, potentially leading to full system compromise. The impact includes complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. Given the high CVSS score and critical severity, this vulnerability poses a severe risk to affected deployments.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until an official fix is available, users should disable or avoid using the automatic execution of commands feature, especially the 'execute safe commands' mode. Implement strict input validation and consider manual review of commands to prevent prompt injection. Monitor vendor channels for updates and patches addressing this vulnerability.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2026-03-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69cae2bce6bfc5ba1d6c3e58
Added to database: 3/30/2026, 8:53:16 PM
Last enriched: 4/7/2026, 6:45:18 AM
Last updated: 5/14/2026, 11:53:15 PM
Views: 73
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.