CVE-2026-30909: CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in TIMLEGGE Crypt::NaCl::Sodium
Crypt::NaCl::Sodium versions through 2.002 for Perl has potential integer overflows. bin2hex, encrypt, aes256gcm_encrypt_afternm and seal functions do not check that output size will be less than SIZE_MAX, which could lead to integer wraparound causing an undersized output buffer. Encountering this issue is unlikely as the message length would need to be very large. For bin2hex() the bin_len would have to be > SIZE_MAX / 2 For encrypt() the msg_len would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 16U For aes256gcm_encrypt_afternm() the msg_len would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 16U For seal() the enc_len would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 64U
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-30909 identifies an integer overflow vulnerability in the Crypt::NaCl::Sodium Perl module, specifically versions through 2.002. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of output buffer sizes in key cryptographic functions including bin2hex, encrypt, aes256gcm_encrypt_afternm, and seal. These functions fail to ensure that the calculated output size does not exceed the maximum value representable by the system's size_t type (SIZE_MAX). When extremely large input lengths are provided—exceeding thresholds such as SIZE_MAX/2 for bin2hex or SIZE_MAX minus small constants for the encryption functions—an integer wraparound can occur. This wraparound results in an undersized output buffer allocation, which can cause buffer overflows or memory corruption during subsequent operations. While theoretically serious, the practical exploitation is constrained by the requirement for very large input sizes, which are uncommon in typical application scenarios. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound). No CVSS score has been assigned yet, and no patches or known exploits are currently available. The flaw could lead to denial of service or potentially memory corruption, but does not directly enable remote code execution or privilege escalation without additional vulnerabilities.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential for memory corruption due to integer overflow-induced buffer misallocation. This can lead to application crashes or denial of service in systems relying on Crypt::NaCl::Sodium for cryptographic operations. Although remote code execution is not directly indicated, memory corruption vulnerabilities can sometimes be leveraged in complex attack chains. The requirement for very large input sizes limits the scope of exploitation, reducing the likelihood of widespread impact. However, organizations processing large volumes of data or using this module in automated cryptographic pipelines might experience stability issues or service disruptions. Confidentiality and integrity of data are not directly compromised by this vulnerability alone, but availability could be affected. The absence of known exploits in the wild further reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the need for vigilance. The vulnerability may also affect software supply chains that incorporate this Perl module, potentially impacting downstream applications.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations using Crypt::NaCl::Sodium should monitor for official patches or updates from the vendor addressing this integer overflow issue. Until a patch is available, developers should implement input validation to restrict message sizes to well below the thresholds that trigger the overflow (e.g., significantly less than SIZE_MAX/2 for bin2hex and corresponding limits for encryption functions). Employing fuzz testing and static analysis tools can help identify unsafe input handling in cryptographic code. Where feasible, consider using alternative cryptographic libraries with robust input size checks. Additionally, sandboxing or isolating processes that handle cryptographic operations can limit the impact of potential memory corruption. Regularly updating Perl environments and dependencies, and auditing code that uses Crypt::NaCl::Sodium for large input handling, will reduce risk. Organizations should also prepare incident response plans for potential denial of service scenarios related to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Canada, France, Australia, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland
CVE-2026-30909: CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in TIMLEGGE Crypt::NaCl::Sodium
Description
Crypt::NaCl::Sodium versions through 2.002 for Perl has potential integer overflows. bin2hex, encrypt, aes256gcm_encrypt_afternm and seal functions do not check that output size will be less than SIZE_MAX, which could lead to integer wraparound causing an undersized output buffer. Encountering this issue is unlikely as the message length would need to be very large. For bin2hex() the bin_len would have to be > SIZE_MAX / 2 For encrypt() the msg_len would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 16U For aes256gcm_encrypt_afternm() the msg_len would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 16U For seal() the enc_len would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 64U
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-30909 identifies an integer overflow vulnerability in the Crypt::NaCl::Sodium Perl module, specifically versions through 2.002. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of output buffer sizes in key cryptographic functions including bin2hex, encrypt, aes256gcm_encrypt_afternm, and seal. These functions fail to ensure that the calculated output size does not exceed the maximum value representable by the system's size_t type (SIZE_MAX). When extremely large input lengths are provided—exceeding thresholds such as SIZE_MAX/2 for bin2hex or SIZE_MAX minus small constants for the encryption functions—an integer wraparound can occur. This wraparound results in an undersized output buffer allocation, which can cause buffer overflows or memory corruption during subsequent operations. While theoretically serious, the practical exploitation is constrained by the requirement for very large input sizes, which are uncommon in typical application scenarios. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound). No CVSS score has been assigned yet, and no patches or known exploits are currently available. The flaw could lead to denial of service or potentially memory corruption, but does not directly enable remote code execution or privilege escalation without additional vulnerabilities.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential for memory corruption due to integer overflow-induced buffer misallocation. This can lead to application crashes or denial of service in systems relying on Crypt::NaCl::Sodium for cryptographic operations. Although remote code execution is not directly indicated, memory corruption vulnerabilities can sometimes be leveraged in complex attack chains. The requirement for very large input sizes limits the scope of exploitation, reducing the likelihood of widespread impact. However, organizations processing large volumes of data or using this module in automated cryptographic pipelines might experience stability issues or service disruptions. Confidentiality and integrity of data are not directly compromised by this vulnerability alone, but availability could be affected. The absence of known exploits in the wild further reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the need for vigilance. The vulnerability may also affect software supply chains that incorporate this Perl module, potentially impacting downstream applications.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations using Crypt::NaCl::Sodium should monitor for official patches or updates from the vendor addressing this integer overflow issue. Until a patch is available, developers should implement input validation to restrict message sizes to well below the thresholds that trigger the overflow (e.g., significantly less than SIZE_MAX/2 for bin2hex and corresponding limits for encryption functions). Employing fuzz testing and static analysis tools can help identify unsafe input handling in cryptographic code. Where feasible, consider using alternative cryptographic libraries with robust input size checks. Additionally, sandboxing or isolating processes that handle cryptographic operations can limit the impact of potential memory corruption. Regularly updating Perl environments and dependencies, and auditing code that uses Crypt::NaCl::Sodium for large input handling, will reduce risk. Organizations should also prepare incident response plans for potential denial of service scenarios related to this vulnerability.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- CPANSec
- Date Reserved
- 2026-03-07T13:09:20.640Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69acc85d2904315ca3180bc1
Added to database: 3/8/2026, 12:52:45 AM
Last enriched: 3/8/2026, 1:07:42 AM
Last updated: 3/8/2026, 3:22:13 AM
Views: 7
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.